Author: Shaun P Kernahan

The Dodgers 2013 Season Review/Report Card

Last night, the Dodgers’ 2013 season came crashing to and end as Superman’s cape caught fire. Clayton Kershaw could not complete five innings and was tagged with seven earned runs in the loss, while counterpart Michael Wacha was dominant for Saint Louis. It’s easy to be disappointed, but a spot in the NLCS is nothing to shake a stick at. For the most part, considering all of the injuries this team sustained, they did reasonably well. The list of players who missed significant time includes Zack Greinke, Josh Beckett, Chad Billingsley, Matt Kemp, Hanley Ramirez, and Andre Ethier. That’s a few hundred million in salary worth of bandaids right there. Let’s take a look at the highs and lows:

Team MVP: Adrian Gonzalez. A Gon is no longer an elite defensive first baseman. In fact, these days, he’s probably among the worst defenders at the position. But he can still knock in some runs. He led the team with 100 ribbies and slugged 22 home runs to lead the team. Most importantly though, he was in the line up pretty much every day. At the beginning of the year, while pretty much everyone was either wounded or struggled horribly, Gonzalez held the fort down and produced. One of the often overlooked things about him is that you can’t really play matchups with him, as he hits lefties just about as well as he does righties. His power may not be what it once was, but he still figures to be productive for seasons to come. Grade: B+

Team Cy Young: Clayton Kershaw. Gee, that one was tough to call, wasn’t it… If not for pathetic run support, especially early on in the year, Kershaw could have won 25 games. His sub 2.00 era for the year led the majors by quite a margin, and he is unquestionably the best pitcher in baseball. Whatever contract extension he eventually signs this off season could be worth upwards of 200 million dollars. And if you judge him by his peers, he’s worth every penny. Grade: A+

Unsung Hero: Juan Uribe. Uribe was an afterthought as the season started. Still on the roster by virtue of his popularity in the clubhouse (and possibly the 8 million guaranteed he was earning) he had this one chance to save his career. Yeah, and that’s pretty much what he did. Taking over at third base for the ineffective, and eventually released Luis Cruz, Uribe played exceptional defense and contributed solidly at the plate with 12 home runs while hitting .278. Those numbers may appear solid if unremarkable, but considering he was below the Mendoza line in 2012 and barely above it in 2011, it was borderline miraculous. If the decision making process was objective, Uribe would win a gold glove. The award will probably go to a bigger name like Ryan Zimmermann or David Wright, superior hitters but not the defenders they once were, but anyone who watched the Dodgers this year knows who really deserves it. Grade: A-

Rookie of the Year: Hyun Jin Ryu. This one was a bit tougher to call, as Yasiel Puig’s emergence undoubtedly turned the season around for the Blue Crew. But while Puig faltered down the stretch, making more and more boneheaded decisions in the field, and striking out with shocking regularity at the plate, Ryu remained steady and effective. He won 14 games, and if not for an irrelevant tune up start at the end of the season in which he gave up 4 earned runs while just getting some work in, he’d have finished with a sub 3.00 era also. And in the biggest game of the season to that point, he out-dueled the brilliant Adam Wainwright in game 3 of the NLCS with seven dominant shut out innings. Grade: A

Biggest Disappointment: Matt Kemp. When you have the tools to be a perennial MVP candidate, much is expected of you. After a monstrous 2011 campaign, Kemp had a rough go of it in 2012, struggling at the plate and in the field while dealing with a myriad of nagging injuries, and one that required a shoulder operation. Early this year, it clearly wasn’t 100% right, despite Kemp’s repeated arguments that it was. Well, if you say it’s right, then we expect performance as if it’s right. And he didn’t perform that way. And to tie a brutal knot on the season for him, he injured his ankle on a play at the plate due to lack of hustle. That’s criminal. Grade: D

Offense: Again, injuries played a part, but with their line up top to bottom, you would have expected that this team scored more runs. Gonzalez led the team with only 22, which about the total to be expected from him at this point in the season, but you could argue that this team could field five 30 home run hitters at once, with a couple of them threatening to reach 40. But, it’s hard to hit them when you’re not in the line up. Regardless, this team had to scratch runs together too much, rather than getting heaps at a time with more power production. And with Carl Crawford stealing a measly 15 bags at the top of the lineup, this lineup is was not equipped to manufacture runs. They needed to slug them home with doubles and round trippers. And they didn’t. That said, some guys had nice years and performed better than expected, like the aforementioned Uribe, and the underrated AJ Ellis once again exceeded expectations by hitting 10 home runs. Grade: C+

Pitching: Well, Kershaw was once again awesome. Greinke, even though he just signed a massive contract, probably deserves an extension already. Not only did he pitch brilliantly all year after missing most of the first six weeks, he showed that he’s a tough guy who protects his hitters. The guys standing in the batters box for you night in and night out like it when you do that. We’ve already established the nice year that Ryu had. Kenley Jansen showed he is a top closer, late season acquisition Brian Wilson showed he has plenty left in the tank, and JP Howell was quietly excellent all year as well. Paco Rodriguez and Ronald Belisario faltered late after pitching well for the most part, and Josh Beckett was a disappointment but injuries probably exacerbated that. All things considered, 2014 looks bright for this group. Grade: A-

Defense: This wasn’t expected to be a strength for this team so the fact that it wasn’t is not a surprise. AJ Ellis was elite at throwing runners out, though he still allows too many passed balls. Uribe was probably the best defensive third baseman in the majors this year, but everywhere else was between mediocre and terrible. Hanley Ramirez, considered a poor defender, was probably better than poor. Andre Ethier, who filled in for the injured Kemp in center, played hard, if not that well. Nobody else, even the highly regarded Mark Ellis, did anything noteworthy. Grade: C

Coaching: Yes, the part we’ve all been waiting for. Don Mattingly, despite taking the team to the NLCS, proved incapable of making a good decision. Look, sometimes you can make the right decision and things go wrong. That’s fine, and should not be held against the manager. But things like overusing relievers, dodgy substitutions, and an incomprehensible batting order can be. Mattingly did do a decent job with the immature Puig, and finally made the smart move of eliminating Brandon League as closer in favor of the better Jansen, but the bad far outweighs the good. However, Rick Honeycutt continues to show he is one of baseball’s better pitching coaches, and deserves a long term contract extension. Tim Wallach and Davey Lopes both contributed as coaches. Nothing to say, really, on Trey Hillman. As Mattingly’s right hand guy, one of his primary responsibilities is helping the manager avoid dumb decisions. Either he didn’t take that responsibility seriously, or inexplicably agreed with Mattingly. Grade: C (nudged there by the excellent Honeycutt; without him, it’s probably a D-)

Front Office: Ned Colletti has been a popolar target for critics. And you can’t really blame them. Look at the ridiculous Brandon League contract, and a bench that’s loaded with utility infielders. Seriously, who needs five utility infielders!!!??? But, he did get team MVP Gonzalez and Carl Crawford for very little. Same with Hanley. And he got ace 1A Greinke in the off season to round out the staff. Not every decision was good, but he spent the money he was given and this team was good enough to win with better coaching and maybe a little luck. The team may want to take a look at it’s scouting department. They’ve found a few gems (Puig, Rodriguez) in the past couple of years, but the farm system looks pretty barren. Grade: C+

2014 Outlook: Well, most key players will be back. They will still have four starting outfielders for three spots, but given the injuries of the past couple of years, that’s not a bad thing. Mark Ellis, Uribe, and Brian Wilson are free agents, and played key roles. Uribe might be back on a one year deal, and they’ll probably try to resign Wilson, but they will need to figure out second base. Some people are clamoring for Robinson Cano, but do they want to spend the reported 300 million dollars Cano wants? More likely, they try speedster Dee Gordon there, or try to work a deal with the crosstown Halos for Howie Kendrick. A repeat NL West crown is probable, but the team will have to be healthy to compete with a team like the Cardinals, the unquestioned cream of the crop in the National League. 100-62 is my guess.

Dodgers Look to Stay Alive Behind Greinke

This year’s NLCS has certainly had its share of drama. You can usually count on at least one one-sided blow out per playoff series, but it just hasn’t happened here yet. Don’t look for it to start today.

The Dodgers need a win today to keep their season alive, and they’ll look to Zack Greinke for a repeat of his masterful 8 inning performance in Game 1. If the Dodgers are going to win, they’ll need lights out pitching to overcome their injury stricken lineup’s inability to hit and Don Mattingly’s inability to manage.

But let’s be fair, Mattingly has not done everything wrong this series, just most things. One of the scant few decisions he’s gotten right is riding Greinke for 8 innings in Game 1, after an entire season of pulling starters not named Kershaw after 6 innings and inserting the ghost of Ronald Belisario. Greinke will be going on regular rest today so there is no reason to think fatigue will play any factor.

The question is, can they manage to scratch a couple of runs together off of the talented Joe Kelly? The answer to that question is, most likely not. To give themselves the best shot of doing so, Mattingly will have to change the batting order, which would be a good decision, so you can bet every last penny you have in the bank that it won’t happen. But, because I’m a masochist, I’ll throw it out there anyway. Step one, move Yasiel Puig to the two spot in front of Adrian Gonzalez. That way, the youngster is protected a little bit. That moves Mark Ellis down to the 7th spot, not as a demotion, but because that’s where his and AJ Ellis’ plate discipline will be best served. Draw some walks and turn that lineup around to give the big hitters more chances.

It all, of course, goes out the window if Hanley and Ethier are unable to go. But in the case that they aren’t, Mattingly should go with Scott Van Slyke and Michael Young rather than Skip Schumaker and Nick Punto…which of course he won’t because he’s incapable of making a smart call by anything other than luck. Van Slyke and Young are the superior offensive players in this equation, and while you’re sacrificing defense, defense is not what the problem has been for the Blue Crew this series.

Am I being too hard on Mattingly? I don’t know, you tell me. He’s the guy who made Brandon League his closer the first quarter of the season.

What do the Cards need to do to win? Well, getting a repeat performance from Kelly would be a good start. He’s young and a bit excitable, but doesn’t cave under pressure so another 6 solid innings isn’t a stretch. Offensively, they’ll need to make Greinke work harder than they did in Game 1. Greinke has a mechanically sound, repeatable delivery, resulting in good command and a lot of first pitch strikes. They swung at a lot of first and early count pitches in Game 1, allowing Greinke to breeze through 8 innings.

If they can work some counts early, even if it means passing on some hittable pitches, they might run his pitch count up to where he could be out of the game after 6 innings. That will put Mattingly in a spot where he’ll have to make important decisions, tilting the scale hugely in favor of Matheny and the Cards.

What’s ultimately going to happen? Heck, I don’t know. I may be going with my heart over my head here, but I think the Dodgers take a close one 3-1. Greinke will be excellent and the bullpen will bend but not break for an inning or two. Meanwhile, a solid effort by Kelly will be just not quite enough, and the series goes back to Saint Louis for Game 6.

Oh, and while I’m at it, we take Game 6 also. I’m unbelievably impressed by what Michael Wacha has been able to do for the Cards down the stretch and in the playoffs, but I don’t think he’ll out duel Clayton Kershaw twice.

Sorry, Dodger fans. That’s where the fairy tale ends. The Cards will take Game 7, as I also don’t think that Hyun Jin Ryu can out duel the brilliant Adam Wainwright twice.

What do you think, did I get it right? If not, I’ll say Shaun spiked my Sprite.

Are You The Fantasy Football Impulse Buyer?

Fantasy football is probably the simplest of all the fantasy sports. In baseball, you have pitching and hitting categories. Anything from a hit by pitch to a single to a stolen base to a hold to WHIP and dozens of other things contribute or affect your score. In basketball it’s rebounds, points, foul shot percentage, steals, etc. In hockey, goals, assists, plus minus and a crapload of goalie stats. Football, it gives us yards gained, touchdowns, and field goals. And of course, the 7 or 8 points you’re hoping to squeeze out of your defense if you weren’t the guy that went way early on Seattle or San Francisco.

What this essentially means is that you have fewer players that will actually contribute to your score. Whereas in baseball, hockey and basketball, every player in the game is a potential fantasy contributor in some way or another. With football, you have a significant number of the players on the field at a given time who will have no direct impact on your team’s point total at the end of the week. There’s also only one game a week, making what a player on your team does during that game all the more critical. In baseball, if your stud first baseman has an off game and goes 0-4, he has five or six more to more than make up for it with a couple of bombs and bathtub full of RBIs. Sidney Crosby might not have picked up any points for you on, say, Monday, but if he hangs a four pointer with a plus 3 on Thursday, you’re still in the black. D Wade turns an ankle on Sunday and plays only 9 minutes, the previous three games he played that week still count.

Come Sunday (assuming the Thursday game didn’t have all of your players in it), you better have your best available guys in. This is the one shot you have to get maximum points. You’re not cycling guys in and out on a daily basis based on who has a game that day. You are looking at your approximately 5 running backs, 5 receivers and maybe 2 tight ends (if you don’t have a Jimmy Graham type) and trying to figure out which 2 backs, 2 receivers, 1 tight end, and one flex is going to give you the best numbers. That’s a lot of pressure! Not in the large scheme of things, but look at it. End up with more points from guys you left on the bench than the guys you put in the lineup and you will likely come up on the short end of the week’s match up.

At the risk of over simplifying, this makes a fantasy football draft more vital than all of the other sports. There aren’t a bunch of minor league studs who were high draft picks a couple of years back, waiting for their shot while you wait to snag them from the waiver wire. In football, high draft picks in football usually play immediately, meaning they’re drafted. Then you have guys who generate preseason buzz. Those are the guys who go late in fantasy drafts as flyers. Most fail to have a fantasy impact. Even fewer guys than that end up being contributors from the waiver wire. Sure, every now and again, an unheralded rookie like Alfred Morris or Arian Foster who was a sixth rounder or no rounder respectively, ends up being a huge find. But almost never do you find a veteran on the waiver wire who suddenly becomes a big fantasy contributor. Sure, guys have huge games sometimes. Nearly 100% of the time, it’s a fluke. Look at Kevin Oglegree last year. Massive game. Huge waiver wire scramble for him. Months of major suckage afterward.  

So, now let me ask you. Did you run out and get Willis McGahee, Brandon Jacobs, or Harry Douglas from the waiver wire? Sure, McGahee is a starter now in Cleveland. Jacobs in New York. Douglas in Atlanta. McGahee was declining anyway when he suffered a knee injury last year with Denver. Jacobs ended up being an afterthought in San Francisco last year. Douglas, despite having some talent, has been a tease in Atlanta for seasons. Did you run out and get one or more of these guys?

If you did, that could mean one of two things. Either your team is so decimated by injuries that you are desperate for any player that has even an outside chance at producing, or you drafted so poorly that any of these guys represent an upgrade over the guys you have.

Or it could mean a third thing. You’re a fantasy impulse buyer. You see a name you recognize suddenly relevant again in pro football and you frantically grab them off the wire. Then you probably do a giddy little dance and brag to the rest of your league about how you got them.

The silver lining here is that you are salvagable. You can be fixed. All you have to do is channel all of your enthusiasm for washed up or never-will-be veterans into rookies that at least have a chance of turning into something. Will McGahee grab a score every now and then to mask his 40 yard or so production? Of course. In fact, Jacobs just had a nice game against Chicago on Thursday. STAY AWAY FROM HIM! It won’t happen again. Sure, Douglas will catch the odd touchdown from Matty Ice. It happens. But are you really benching guys like Torrey Smith, Eric Decker, Anquan Boldin, DeSean Jackson, Cecil Shorts, etc. to put him in your line up? Why did I choose those names? Because they are all wide receivers who were very likely NOT the first or second one you chose in your draft, but are viable fantasy producers. Think about it. If a guy has either always sucked, or is well into a pattern of decline and perpetual suckage, it isn’t likely to change. Your odds are much better taking a crack at a guy like Zac Stacy. Sure the Rams suck, but he’s starting now. And he’s a rookie, so there isn’t anything to say that he can’t be the next Alfred Morris or Arian Foster, whereas there is everything to say that Jacobs, McGahee and Douglas will continue to be every bit the irrelevant fantasy entities they have either always been or have been steadily heading towards.

As always, good luck this week…unless of course you are playing against me. 🙂

The Government Could Learn a Thing of Two from Baseball

I am as far from politically plugged in as it gets, but I am already sick of this government shutdown crap.  Now, how can I rant about it here on The Stain, ah, easy, cause it reminds me a ton of the 1994 baseball strike.

Flashback to August of 1994, me, having just turned 9, had lived up to my word of several years prior and went on my first flight sans parents.  I flew out to the East coast to spend a week and a half with my grandfather and great-grandfather.  I had long looked forward to my first game at Fenway Park, but something happened, baseball suddenly shut down, and Fenway Park was not hosting any more baseball games that year.

Earlier, that spring, I had read a book for my 3rd grade book report about Ken Griffey Jr., and I was watching a historical season come to an end with him sitting at 40 home runs, on pace to set the single season home run record had they played the final 51 games of the season.

It was the first time since World War II there was no World Series.  Something we all take for granted was taken away from us, all because people whose salaries are paid for by people like you and me, couldn’t get together and come to a mutual decision.

Sound familiar?  Yup, a bunch of people in Washington, who have jobs because they have been elected to do said job, can’t sit down and figure out a budget.  So, places people travel across the country to visit, be it a national park or a monument in D.C. are closed, just as Fenway Park was closed 19 years ago.  The son of a military man can’t go to the doctor because military health insurance has been suspended, something that nobody thought would go away, just as nobody thought we would go without a World Series leading into the 1994 baseball season.

Baseball hit a major low in the seasons following the 1994 work stoppage, and it took two men taking performance enhancing drugs, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa, to get the public interest back to baseball.  Let’s just hope it doesn’t take drastic measures like that to get the government running again.

You can follow Shaun Kernahan on twitter @shaunkernahan, add him to your network on Google, and like Shaun on Facebook.

Did Juan Uribe Save Don Mattingly’s Job?

It looks that way, doesn’t it? Let’s be fair, Don Mattingly probably deserves to be a manager. Not of a team like the Dodgers with bottomless pockets and perennial World Series aspirations. But probably somewhere. In the awful Frank McCourt era, he worked hard with a cobbled together roster and probably got better results than anyone could have really hoped for. In 2013, with a star-studded roster, the list of things he did right is a short one. One was how he handled Cuban sensation Yasiel Puig’s transition to the big leagues. The other was giving maligned third baseman, Juan Uribe another shot.

From his complete mismanagement of the bullpen, to his incomprehensible lineup and batting order changes, to his chronic disastrous late inning decision making, there isn’t a person in baseball who probably deserved to lose his job more than Mattingly. If you didn’t know better, you’d swear he was intentionally making the worst possible decision in some sort of sick experiment to see if his team could win anyway.

But with one swing of the bat that almost never happened, it all changed. After two failed attempts to bunt Puig, who had led of Game 4’s bottom of the 8th inning with a double, over to third, Uribe hit the most significant Dodger home run since Kirk Gibson’s 1988 moment of magic against Dennis Eckersley… or arguably Steve Finley’s division clinching grand slam. Gone was the stench of the awful decision to bring in Ronald Belisario in the top of the 7th, who was so bad down the stretch that he should have been left off the postseason roster in favor of, believe it or not, Carlos Marmol. Yeah, the same Carlos Marmol that was picked off of Chicago’s scrap heap and was even reasonably effective as the season wound down. Forgotten, if only briefly, was his criminal overuse of Paco Rodriguez, resulting in one of the league’s best left-handed relievers becoming a veritable batting practice tosser in games that matter. History was his unconscionable reluctance to go veteran JP Howell in high leverage situations, despite Howell’s lengthy track record of excellence with Tampa Bay in a tough AL East division. Swept under the rug was leaving ace Clayton Kershaw in Game 1 for more than 120 pitches despite a huge lead and the very real possibility (and ultimately reality) that Kershaw would come back for Game 4 on short rest.

But it almost never happened. Because, you see, Mattingly was having Uribe bunt Puig over. Bunt. Uribe, apart from Hanley Ramirez, had been the team’s best hitter down the stretch. After a meteoric beginning, Puig struggled in September. Adrian Gonzalez wore down, and while still productive, only hit a handful of home runs the last two months. Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier battled injuries. It was Uribe who really steadied the ship. Always a solid defender, he was spectacular at third base. Streaky for most of his career, he remained consistent down the stretch. Overly aggressive for his entire career, he showed patience, resulting in a career high on base percentage. And for you SABR metric lovers, his WAR was better than Ryan Zimmermann, and only a little worse than David Wright, the two benchmarks for NL third basemen.

Fortunately, David Carpenter’s 96 mile per hour fastballs are not easy to bunt, and Uribe, a pretty competent bunter in limited sample sizes, was only able to foul them off. Had he successfully gotten the bunt down, it would have been up to Skip Schumaker and AJ Ellis to knock Puig in from third. And while there’s no way to tell what would have happened, if their at bats against Carpenter were any indication, it wouldn’t have happened. But it didn’t have to, because one of the Dodgers’ hottest hitters could now forget about the idiotic bunt plan and swing away. And the rest was history.

Now, instead of being on the job hunt, where by all rights he should be, Don Mattingly is “leading” his team in the NLCS. It’s funny how little things make such a big difference. It’s inevitable that Mattingly, who is quite intelligent but whose IQ seems to drop by 100 points every time an important decision needs to be made in the course of a baseball game, will remind us again soon of why he really isn’t fit to manage a team with championship hopes.

But for now, that’s all forgotten.

5 of the Most Overrated Head Coaches/Managers in Sports

Let’s all just be honest with one another. A coach or manager’s job, while difficult in an application sense, has a pretty simple description. Put your team in the best possible position to have a chance at winning the game, and pretty much stay out of the way. This means you game plan, strategize, encourage, discipline, train, cheer, substitute, and face the media. But essentially, it’s the players that have to play the game, and why the teams that win championships at the end of the year are the teams that have a preponderance of the best players, not a bunch of scrubs with a great manager. However, time and time again, you see teams with an abundance of talent that consistently underachieve. Often, the finger can be pointed to sub par (or incompetent, if we’re speaking truthfully) leadership.

Who the hell are you, Torsten? What makes you the authority on good coaching and lousy coaching? Good question, I suppose. I can only say this: I’m a guy with an opinion. I guy that observes. And in three and a half decades of watching sports on a daily basis (sorry, ladies, I’m married), I’ve seen a lot of great, good, bad, and ugly. And most often, what looks like a duck and quacks like a duck turns out to be a duck.

Remember one thing before we continue. This column contains the word “overrated” in the title. This isn’t to imply that the coaches/managers mentioned herein should be unemployed. It just means they’re constantly having praise heaped upon them by fawning and starstruck members of the media when the reality is, they’re far from the best in their profession. Some of the names may surprise you, and I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if you disagreed with me. It would only mean that you’re wrong. That’s fine. Without further ado.

Phil Jackson – What’s he won, eleven NBA Championships as a coach? Wow, he must be the greatest coach ever!!! I bet you think you know what’s coming. Anyone can coach Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen to titles. No, no. BUT, as we determined earlier, championship teams generally have the best players. Let’s look at the last few championships across sports. Who has won them? The Blackhawks, The Heat, The Cardinals, Manchester United, Baltimore Ravens, Novak Djokovic. These are teams with some of the greatest talent collections in their sport in the World, or in Novak Djokovic’s case, the most talented player currently playing. So it stands to reason that a team with players like Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen, Dennis Rodman, Steve Kerr, Toni Kukoc, etc. would have a reasonable shot at winning a title, right? You could say the same for the Lakers of the Kobe Bryant Shaquille O’Neil era. In Jackson’s case, his shortcomings really come to light when you see him in instances where hurdles and challenges had to be overcome.

Let’s go back to 2011. The Lakers were coming off of back-to-back championships and expectations for a third were high. The roster was stacked. Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, pre-substance abuse issue Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum, and Ron Artest. But something happened. Dallas coach Rick Carlisle and his team saw something, a way to break down the Lakers’ defense and a way to combat their triangle offense. What they did was put the onus on the Lakers to make an adjustment, and in four games they never did. As each game moved closer and closer to a loss, cameras repeated focused on Jackson and all he could do was stare wide-eyed and sullenly at the court. He literally had no answers. Now, could he have tried a different approach, changed things up at half time in a desperate attempt to reverse the course of the game and get his team back in it, and still have failed? Of course. But the point is, he had nothing. He has the triangle offense, which wasn’t even invented by him. That was Tex Winter. And when that isn’t working, he had the two greatest one-on-one players in the history of the game in Bryant and MJ whom he would look to to just take over. JJ Barea, Dallas’ tiny point guard in this series was nearly unstoppable. Did they try to neutralize him by posting him up when on offense and get him in foul trouble? Did they attack the offensively brilliant but defensively vulnerable Dirk Nowitzki at all? Did they try any real drive and kick to free up their sharp shooters? No. Is there a guarantee that any of it would have worked? Of course not. But we’ll never know, because the thought of attempting to change it up never crossed his mind, evidently. Carlisle turns out to be a master strategist, as you can see how the Mavs shocked everyone by toppling Miami and LeBron James. And Eric Spoelstra DID try to change things up, and the Mavs just won. Jackson, he’s just, well, a Zen Master I suppose. He does have a way of nurturing harmony, excising petulance in young stars, and manipulating referees. He’s not the worst coach in the world, and would deserve to have a job if he was looking for one, but is he the best like everyone is so quick to anoint him? Not even close. Need more proof? He started Smush Parker at point guard in MULTIPLE NBA games. Smush Parker. And 97-year-old Derek Fisher. Seriously. Started. Games that mattered.

Jeff Fisher – After a positively mediocre tenure in Tennessee, highlighted by one Superbowl appearance despite a talented roster with a lock-down defense for much of his career there, Fisher took his talents to St. Louis, after some time off. The Savior of St. Louis football, they screamed. The Rams finally had that coach to lead them out of a decade that was one of the worst in professional sports history. So in comes Fisher, in comes a new general manager, and the Rams immediately improve by 5 wins, including impressive performances twice against the 49rs and twice against the vaunted Seahawks, including in a losing effort on the last day of the season in Seattle, where no team but the Seahawks won a game last year. The Fisher Effect, they called it. See? All this team needed was a coach who knew his ass from a hole in the ground, a bit of a roster overhaul to get rid of the excess baggage, and a personnel department that actually knew what a football was. Sure, all of that helped a little. It also helped that the Rams had sucked for so long, every team expected a walk-over when they saw St. Louis on their schedule. They weren’t used to a Rams team that had a roster of over 50 NFL players instead of 12 NFL players and over 40 pretenders. In the midst of all this improvement, however, was a disturbing pattern. Fisher is incredibly predictable.

Most NFL coaches add wrinkles to their playbook and play calling as the weeks go on. They incorporate new things, review tapes from previous weeks to make sure that they aren’t giving things away by falling into too much of a pattern. By all appearances though, you would think Fisher looks at game tape and thinks, We absolutely must find what was a total disaster last week, and do that on every play this week. Of course that’s not the case, but look at the tape. Look at the highlights. Not only does Fisher, much like Jackson, seem painfully unable to attempt any kind of adjustments when things aren’t working, he consistently calls plays with incredibly low probability of being successful. On top of that, even, he makes the defense defend only the minimum part of the field.

Allow me to digress for a moment into football philosophy 101. A football field is 120 yards long counting both endzones, and just over 53 yards wide (we’re going to round down because math…well, math is hard.) The maximum distance a defensive team will ever be responsible for is just under 110 yards since they don’t defend the end zone they’re trying to score into. That’s 5,830 square yards of field to defend. Since the average quarterback can probably throw the ball 60 yards past the line of scrimmage (just to use a round number because math…well, I’m just not very good at it.) you can postulate that the defense will be responsible for actively defending 3,180 yards at a given time, provided there’s enough field left to defend. That works out to just under 55% of the field. 11 guys have to defend that vast expanse of field. It’s not much of a surprise that it’s an offensive league these days, is it? Well, Fisher and his braintrust simply refuse to attempt any pass play more than 8 yards down the field. Despite Sam Bradford attempting more passes than any quarterback in the league so far this year, his passes travel an average of something like 6.7 yards in the air. (we’re going to round up to ten because math… I’m running out of math jokes.) When the defense knows with near certainty that any play attempted is going to be less than ten yards from the line of scrimmage, it means they only have to be responsible for 530 square yards. That’s only 9% of the field. And the actuality is more like 7% because we rounded up. There’s an entire formulaic process that goes way more in depth than this, and I think I’m going to write about it at a later date, because I’m still shocked about the fake punt attempt against the Cowboys two weeks ago. The probability of that play on fourth and 8 had maybe a 5% chance of success where a regular old “let’s go for it” play on fourth down sat around 35%, even with Fisher’s unwillingness to try pass plays of longer than 7 yards. Anyway, moving on.

Can some of Fisher’s futility be blamed on an offensive coordinator who is completely inept, and a defensive coordinator who appears far out of his depth, and a personnel department that somehow looks every bit as incompetent as the previous regime, demonstrating shocking profligacy with high draft picks and head scratching idiocy with free agent signings?  Sure. But since Fisher has input in those decisions too, he really is mostly to blame for how God awful of a team he has. There’s still hope for him though. To be fair, he has the reputation of being a likable guy and player’s coach, that his guys like him, play hard for him, and will do what he says. Now, he just has to say things that aren’t moronic.

Joe Torre – Torre’s 12 year stint as Yankee manager is still reasonably fresh in most people’s minds, and his defenders will vehemently shout that he led the pinstripes to the postseason each of his seasons in charge, and won 4 World Series titles with the Yanks. A closer look though reveals that during the Yanks’ run of three straight titles, and four of five, they had such an advantage over the rest of the MLB field that it’s shocking they won only four with Torre in charge. Bottomless coffers allowed them to sign any player they wanted, and George Steinbrenner’s complete disregard for the luxury tax reinforced that. Yet somehow, after 2000, this team just couldn’t make it happen in the postseason. Sure, there was the heartbreaking loss to Arizona on Luis Gonzales’ duck snort single off of Mo Rivera. But really, none of it should be a surprise. Why? Because Torre treated his bullpen like sweatshop workers. Scott Proctor, Paul Quantrill, Ramiro Mendoza, Luis Vizcaino, Joba Chaimberlain, Ron Villone. He found one or two guys not named Mariano in his bullpen that were throwing reasonably well, and pitched them in what seemed like every game. That goes great, and all, for the first few months of the season, but when the post season rolls around and your top relievers have already thrown nearly 100 innings, they’re spent. Especially when you consider how many times they must have gotten up in the pen to warm up but never actually entered the game. In some cases, these guys recovered by the next year and pitched well, or ok… until September anyway. In other cases, like Scott Proctor, he was never the same. His arm was toast, and by the time he was on the Dodgers (along with Torre, incidentally) he was cooked. Joba Chaimberlain and his malevolent arsenal of pitches was one of baseball’s biggest future stars. But years later and still a Yankee, he’s mediocre at best. The trend continued when Torre took over the Dodgers. Veteran Chan Ho Park, still with excellent stuff but a delicate body, was run into the ground and was essentially useless down the stretch. It’s a miracle that Mariano Rivera never had arm problems in his career, and I’m firmly convinced it’s only because he hasn’t thrown a breaking ball in 15 years. That’s the only reason I can think of that Mo survived Torre’s overuse.

Now, is this because Torre just hated relievers? Was it trust issues, as he alluded to in his memoir/autobiography, The Yankee Years (featuring also the outstanding Tom Verducci)? Unless I’m way off, bullpen guys who aren’t closers have always seemed to me to be treated kind of like the kicker or punter of a football team. Yeah, they’re kind of necessary to have around, but they’re not really treated like the other guys on the team. Anyone remember Tony Cogan? He was a promising lefty in the Royals organization who made his major league debut in 2000. Cogan got off to a good start, but faltered and was demoted. Allegedly, Cogan told a coach on the team that his arm was hurting and was told, paraphrased, you’re a piece of meat to us and your job is to go in there and pitch when we tell you to.

I got that story years ago from someone close to Cogan, and at the time, to me too. Was that Torre’s philosophy also? Relievers are interchangeable parts that, much like brake pads, should just be discarded when worn too thin, replaced by shiny new ones? Nothing would indicate that. I’ve scoured the internet from top to bottom looking for any possible instance of Torre hearing from a reliever, “Coach, my arm is hanging, I don’t think I have it today,” and Torre firing back, “Awww, you’re arm is hanging? Well, here’s a nice warm glass of shut the @#$% up and get out there and pitch.” I didn’t find any. So rather than disregard for the human being, it can only be a lack of ability to comprehend that throwing a baseball overhand is not a natural motion, and that the arms that do it fatigue eventually.

Want a simpler reason why Torry is overrated? He’s won 53% of the games he’s managed in his career, counting the 12 seasons he was with the Yankees and their highest-in-sport payroll. Joe Girardi inherited an older version of that team with stiffer AL East competition and has won 57% of his games as manager.

Roberto Martinez – Long considered one of soccer’s brightest managerial rising stars, Martinez currently plies his trade with Everton in the English Premier League. Before that, he was with since-relegated Wigan Athletic, and before that, since-PROMOTED Swansea. So let’s get this straight, he leaves Swansea for Wigan, and then Swansea gets promoted to the top flight. Wigan eventually gets relegated a couple seasons later. Again, he leaves a place and they improve. He joins a place and they regress.

Martinez is not an incompetent soccer mind. He actually has ideas. He doesn’t just throw 4-4-2 formations on the field and hope for the best. He wants his team to play with style, attack, control the ball, and possess a bit of panache. It makes for entertaining soccer, that’s for sure. But is it effective?

Wigan Athletic is a tiny team when compared to others in the Premier League. To attempt to play the same style of soccer as Manchester United or Arsenal with 1/100th of the budget, not to mention even a smaller percentage than that of appeal to potential players, is lunacy. To compare Wigan to Stoke City, a similarly small team in the top flight who has consistently battled for and secured mid-table security, is as close to fair as I can come. Stoke’s philosophy is simple. Turn their home stadium (The Brittania) into a fortress, defend resolutely, and be effective on set pieces. For years, the Wigan philosophy was the same. When they first came up under manager Paul Jewell, they held a hard line with rugged defenders, Arjan De Zeeuw, Stephane Henchoz, and Matt Jackson. Later on with Steve Bruce, it was the same with the burly Titus Bramble, towering Paul Scharner, and other notable tough guys, Kevin Kilbane and Emerson Boyce. Fast forward to the Martinez era, their defensive players included Boyce, Antolin Alcaraz, Maynor Figueroa, and Gary Caldwell. These guys have one thing in common, and it’s that they’re tough guys who are willing to do the dirty work. Yet Martinez insisted that these guys, ill-skilled to do so, play their way out of trouble in the back rather than hammer the ball to safety. And predictably, Wigan’s defense was among the league’s leakiest for Martinez’ entire tenure in Wigan.

It reminds me of when my dad was my AYSO coach. My dad played soccer at pretty high levels in Germany, South Africa, and eventually here in the States with the Hollywood Kickers and Hollywood Stars. Anyone who knows anything about AYSO knows that generally speaking, each team ends up with a few good players, a handful of decent players, a couple mediocre ones, a bad one or two, and one or two kids who are so out of place on a soccer field that it’s evident their parents just wanted a babysitter for a couple hours a week. One of these kids was Sean V., a nice kid…and really really overweight. Sean could barely run but AYSO rules made you play him somewhere for half the game, so my dad slotted him in at right fullback and prayed. Valiantly, my dad attempted to teach Sean and the other kids how to control the ball at the back and play it to a teammate, rather than just boot it. Some of the kids got it a little bit, but Sean repeatedly fell on the ball, had it hit him in the nutsack, deflected it into the path of an onrushing opposing forward, just about everything bad that you could imagine. Finally, my dad gave up and told Sean, “Buddy, forget the control and pass thing. If you have that ball come to you, give it good whack back up the field.” Sean cheerily replied, “No problem, coach!” And you know what, it worked. No, Sean did not all of a sudden become a good soccer player, or a good defender. But about 90% of the calamities he committed on the field went away, and more often than not, when the ball came to him, he successfully slugged it back where it came from.

The moral of the story is this. You can’t shoehorn your philosophy into a roster that is ill-equipped to handle it. You can pick certain guys who are good fits, and install pieces of it. You can have your attackers take creative approaches and try inventive things because if they foul it up, it’s no big thing. But you can’t take a collection of tough guys who are best at and used to hard-nosed defending and turn them into Franz Beckenbauer. It just doesn’t work that way. He’s off to a good start at Everton, but it’s a small sample size so far so we shall see.

Dusty Baker – The real shocker here is that Baker continues to be employed by teams that should contend. Take this year’s Reds, how could that team not perform better? Big time hitters, a legitimate pitching staff with a legitimate ace and a big time closer, yet they squeaked into the wild card game…and lost. Somehow, Baker managed to work it out so that Mat Latos, the team’s best starter, couldn’t pitch the biggest game of the year, and decided to give the ball to Johnny Cueto, who although talented, spent most of the season on the DL with lat issues. It’s easy to speak in hindsight, but you know, veteran Bronson Arroyo was there too.

That’s just the most recent example. While with the Cubs, he managed to put together a couple of good seasons, but in the process, managed to destroy Kerry Wood and Mark Prior, two of the most talented right handed pitchers to come along in generations. Is it all his fault? Probably not. In Prior’s case, alleged steroid use may have had something to do with it. But both guys threw incredibly hard with ridiculous sliders, one of the pitches that is hardest on the arm. When guys like that are at the top of the league in pitch count per start, isn’t there something wrong? Look, I don’t buy completely into pitch count, but guys that throw 40+ 90mph sliders per start should probably be monitored a little bit, no?

Additionally, I’m not all in on Moneyball like some guys, but I’m also not dismissive of on base percentage. Sure, I’d rather have a guy that has a higher batting average (sure, call me old fashioned) because that guy is more likely to get a hit with two outs and a guy in scoring position, where a walk won’t really accomplish anything. However, let’s go back to this year’s Reds. When you have sluggers like Joey Votto and Jay Bruce (to say nothing of the very good Brandon Phillips), how is OBP not a priority at the top of the line up?

I’m not saying that Baker has nothing offer as a manager. Put him in charge of a young team that isn’t necessarily expected to compete, and let him teach those players something. He was, after all, a very good player who always gave his best. And he’s not completely useless when it comes to decision-making, just when the health of his pitching staff and the production of his offense is at stake. Ok… so he is kind of useless. But he can still teach young players a thing or two about playing the game. Apart, of course, from “toothpicks being an excellent source of protein.”

Did I miss anyone? Let me know in the comments. Coming soon, the other side of the coin. Coaches who are underappreciated for their contributions and abilities to lead. And maybe another fantasy tip sheet, but I have to win again before that happens. It’s been a rough couple of weeks. Until then, cheers.

Fantasy: Sit ’em / Start ’em for Week 4

Sorry for not being able to share with you the pearls of fantasy wisdom (or idiocy, depending on which pieces of my advice you chose to take) for week 3. I was on my honeymoon so I think I can be excused. But I’m back for week 4, with your fantasy recipes for glory (or disaster, if one of my key predictions fails and you get shafted as a result) and victory (or humiliating defeat, depending on…well, you get it).

Standard disclaimer, you don’t need me to tell you to start Peyton Manning, so that is not what this column is about. It’s about filling your flex spot, 3rd RB or WR, or your quarterback in the event you missed out on the top 6-8 and have to choose between two guys with potentially similar output. Get it? Got it? Good.

If you got ’em, start em:

QB: Jay Cutler – Is it because he’s actually looked pretty good this season so far? Well, that’s part of it, but the Bears also have Detroit this week. The Lions have a pretty solid D line, but a dodgey secondary. I don’t see them doing much on the ground, so that leaves one other option. You could hit a jackpot of 25-30 points here.

RB: Frank Gore – Yeah, there was that little melt down on the sidelines in the second half of the Indianapolis game, but he did average 8 yards or so on his 11 carries. And while the Rams have some talent on defense, utterly incompetent defensive coaching and game planning leave them vulnerable to massive games by opposing backs, whether their good, bad, ugly, or whatever. And Gore is still good. He could go for 180 and 3 tds. More likely is about 125 and one or two scores.

RB: Bilal Powell – You know, either he’s not as crappy as people say, or the Jets offensive line is better than anticipated… or both. Not only is timeshare mate, Chris Ivory, dealing with a hamstring issue, Powell has outperformed him anyway. The Titans are, believe it or not, NOT the world’s best rushing defense, nor are they a threat to break the game open and force the Jets to abandon the run. 15 carries for 75 yards and maybe a score is a good bet. He also chips in a few receptions here and there, so if you’re in a PPR league, consider him.

WR: Lance Moore – As streaky as they come, he’s WAY overdue for a monster game. I’ve said it before, wide receivers are divas, by in large, and tend to pout if they don’t get balls thrown their way. Moore is not without talent, and after a completely anonymous beginning to the year, look for Drew Brees to get him involved.

WR: Pierre Garcon – They’re playing the Raiders. Ok? That should really be enough for you. That said, the silver and black have been a little better than many thought so far, but Garcon can be a challenge for even high end defensive backs, and the Raiders don’t have anyone in that category in my opinion. And eventually, RG3 is gonna break out, right?

TE: Brent Celek – He’s always been a pretty good player, but in the Chip Kelly system his opportunities are multiplying. Plus, Denver might score 60 against the porous Philly D this week and if they want to keep up, they’ll need to throw.

If you’re streaming defenses, and by some miracle Kansas City is still available, they’re going against a Giants team that just got shut out by Carolina. And the Vikings have the Steelers, who haven’t been able to do anything in terms of moving the ball. Need a kicker? If Kai Forbath misses out again for the Skins, his replacement John Potter should be available in about 84012564% of leagues, and kicking for a team that will put up some points.

If you can, sit ’em:

QB: Andy Dalton: That Cleveland defense is tough. And Joe Haden is every bit the man to contain AJ Green. Cincy should win this game, but it will likely be The Law Firm and/or Gio Bernard who get most of the scoring glory. Don’t just cut bait on Dalton though. This is just not a good matchup, and he’ll pay nice dividends for you moving forward, especially when you consider in what round you probably got him.

RB: Daryl Richardson/Isaiah Pead: Whoever starts for the Rams (D Rich has a foot issue), it won’t matter. You want no part of them. The Rams may be able to move the ball a little bit against an Aldon Smith-less 49er defense, but it won’t be on the ground.

WR: Wes Welker. Just kidding. Checking to see if you’re still paying attention.

WR: Julian Edelman: Listen, he’s done a nice job in a role he really isn’t equipped to fill. There’s a good chance that Rob Gronkowski may be back this week, and if he is, Edelman will slip out of the number 1 target for Tom Brady role he inherited, back into a more appropriate complementary role he has excelled in for a while now.

TE: Kyle Rudolph: Remember how he scored like a zillion touchdowns last year? So do the Vikings opponents. They’re watching him now in the red zone, so AP is getting the carries he should be getting anyway, and Ponder has shown some reasonably good scrambling ability recently as well.

Yup, it’s getting tougher. The bye weeks are here and it’s going to be tougher to pick your guys. I hope the above advice is helpful to you, and if you think I screwed the pooch on any of them, feel free to leave your opinion in the comments.

Fantasy: Sit ’em & Start ’em for Week 2

Bit of a mixed bag as far as the results from the week 1 column go. Got the running backs pretty much right, got the quarterbacks right, though Philip Rivers was better than expected, nailed Jared Cook and Zach Sudfeld, and even Greg Zuerlein got ya 14 points from the kicker spot if you listened. Then again, I did recommend benching Anquan Boldin… and recommended starting Cecil Shorts or T.Y. Hilton… so perfect it definitely wasn’t. That said, we now have a week under our belts and therefore a decent idea of how workload is going to be distributed. Anyhoo, the following guys are recommendations for your RB3, WR3, or Flex spot, as well your Tight End (if you have someone other than Jimmy Graham), and guys you should probably avoid playing. In no way should any of it be confused for a recommendation to bench a mega stud like AP or AJ Green for any of these guys. If you do that, you’re a moron and your parents should be ashamed.

If You Got ‘Em, Start ‘Em

QB: Michael Vick – His line sure looked good agains the Skins. Here’s the thing, a lot of fantasy “experts” are saying he looked gimpy or injured at the end of the game. He kind of did, but the point here is, they’re telling you to be careful. Don’t. Yeah, Vick scored a short rushing TD, but apart from that, didn’t rely on his legs too much. His passing on the other hand, looked crisp and accurate. Philly as San Diego at home this week, and Vick will be good for at least 25 points, gimpy leg or not.

RB: Maurice Jones-Drew – Sound obvious? Well he was invisible against Kansas City last week. That won’t be the case against the Raiders this week. I’m not saying Jacksonville is going to win this game. As long as Blaine Gabbert is the quarterback there, they may never win another game. But Drew should be a lock for at least one score, and if the Jags coaches open their eyes and finally play Chad Henne, he’s probably good for 50 receiving yards too. Look for 14 points or more.

RB: David Wilson – You heard me, he of the two fumbles. Monitor this one as Tom Coughlin said they’re going to watch him in practice this week. If Wilson pouts and doesn’t try hard, he might be a pre-game inactive. But if he works hard on his technique like the coaches ask, he’ll keep the lion’s share of the workload in the Giants’ backfield. The Broncos are missing some guys on D, so there’s opportunity here. He could hang a goose egg, which would suck, but I’m thinking he’s good for double digits.

RB: D’Angelo Williams – Yes, again. He didn’t get in the endzone, but he looked good against a stout Seattle defense. Buffalo’s run defense? Not so stout. You could hit the jackpot with 150 total yards and a score.

WR: James Jones – Goose egg in week one didn’t look good. But Aaron Rodgers knows, it’s not a good idea to not target one of your main guys for two weeks in a row. Receivers are primadonnas, by in large, and if they don’t see the rock a bit, they sulk. As good as Cobb and Nelson were in week one, Rodgers needs Jones’ powerful red zone presence to remain motivated so expect him to get several targets and a score this week.

WR: Eric Decker – He’s actually not a primadonna, but he didn’t see much of the ball week one against Baltimore. Still, Peyton likes him so he’ll get some cookies. Will probably score, maybe twice this week. The Giants’ secondary is not intimidating.

TE: Jared Cook – Yes, again. Did I already use that one? Anyway, the match up is juicy. Atlanta’s defense is better than it looks, but they’re a bit vulnerable deep down the middle and that’s where Cook is dangerous.

If you’re streaming defenses, you may want to peek at Jacksonville or Green Bay this week. I don’t think RG3 is going to play well at Lambeau.

If You Can, Sit ‘Em

QB: Colin Kaepernick – Ok, don’t get get cute. Chances are you are starting Kaep. BUT, if you happen to have Sam Bradford on your bench, or even Jay Cutler, you may want to evaluate this situation carefully. Seattle is a brutal place to play, and their secondary is much better than Green Bay’s. You won’t see Boldin go for 700 yards again, or whatever he made me look stupid by getting in week 1.

RB: Isaac Redman – Is he good? No. Is Cincy’s front 7 good? You betcha.

RB: Monte Ball – The Giants are going to blitz a lot, so the Broncos are going to with a lot of Knowshon Moreno, not based on merit from week one, but he’s an outstanding blocker.

WR: Roddy White – He’s brilliant when he’s healthy, but right now he’s not. He’s a veteran and a tough guy, so he’ll probably suit up, but his effectiveness will be limited by a dodgy ankle and a capable Janoris Jenkins chasing him around.

TE: Jordan Cameron – Don’t get me wrong, I’m impressed with this kid. But I think Baltimore’s defense is well coached and knows that Weeden likes Cameron a lot. They’ll take away one of his top weapons any way they can.

There you have it, folks. Gourmet recipe for fantasy goodness delivered. Good luck this weekend!

Worst Rule In Football Exposed Sunday

We had the first full day of NFL football on Sunday, and there was a rule that came up that needs to be changed, fixed, and consistently applied.  That rule is the “Calvin Johnson” rule.  The rule requiring a receiver to maintain possession of the ball through the ground on a touchdown catch occurred at least twice Sunday, but only once was it recognized.

Calvin Johnson himself fell victim to the rule yet again, but Victor Cruz should have been, based on the letter of the law.  I will go ahead and address the homerism issue that may come up here since the Cruz touchdown was against the Dallas Cowboys.  I believe the rule should be demolished, I believe the Cruz touchdown should be a touchdown, and so should the Calvin Johnson play, even if it would likely lead to me losing in my main fantasy league.  That is what should happen, but it is not the rule, and by rule, both plays should have been ruled incomplete, and much like the tuck rule, someday it will be removed, but until it is, it must be enforced, and enforced with consistency, which isn’t happening.

The rule states: “If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball after he touches the ground, whether in the field of play or the end zone.  If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass is incomplete.  If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete.”

I want to point out that the rule does state, “with or without contact by an opponent”.  Why point this out?  Because many analysts showing the highlight have said something to the effect of “Calvin should know better, especially since he wasn’t touched”.  Well that doesn’t matter, but you have to believe that is the reason Victor Cruz’ touchdown wasn’t even reviewed.  In the Cruz play, he only got one foot on the ground before taking a hit and lunging into the end zone.  He reached the ball out, it hit the ground, popped out of his hand, and rolled away.  Referees then signaled touch down, play not even reviewed.

Calvin Johnson on the other hand, catches the ball with two feet on the ground, dives forward with full control of the ball, when he hits the ground in the end zone, the ball jars loose, but remains in his arms, and he comes up ball in hand.  This play is reviewed and overturned.

Again, I think this rule is poorly written and should be changed, but while it is in place, why can’t there be consistency?  Why did nobody even bother pointing out this rule, especially since it was brought up in a game earlier in the day?  What is the difference between the two plays?  Why don’t the referees remain consistent on a rule that is pretty clear cut?  No, seriously, why, I really want to know.

You can follow Shaun Kernahan on twitter @shaunkernahan, add him to your network on Google, and like Shaun on Facebook.

The Stain Predicts the NFL Season

Torsten’s NFC Division Winners:

 

NFC East: NY Giants – I don’t love any team in this division, but they always have a decent pass rush, a Superbowl winning quarterback, solid receivers, and a sure-as-hell-looks-like-a-stud running back in David Wilson. They’re not a great team, but still better than the others in this division.

 

NFC North: Green Bay Packers – Like in boxing and MMA, a champ is the champ until someone takes it from them… or they test positive for steroids… ok, so that was a terrible analogy. But you get what I’m saying. They’re the titleholders currently, and nobody else in the NFC North has improved enough to threaten them.

 

NFC South: Atlanta Falcons – Offensively stacked and then you add Steven Jackson as an improvement over Michael Turner, ok, I’m in. The defense still looks questionable but this team is going to score points by the boatload.

 

NFC West: Seattle Seahawks – Both Seattle and San Francisco are excellent, but I think Seattle is a little deeper, especially on offense. Also, Seattle has a bigger home field advantage than San Francisco (the Rams didn’t tie Seattle on the road, now did they?) so I’ll give them the nod.

 

Wild Cards

 

San Francisco 49rs – As a Rams fan, let’s not mince words. I hate the Niners. They’re a pretty stacked team though, especially on defense. They’re a virtual lock for 11 wins, with an upside of 14. And Frank Gore is still great after all these years. Who’d have thunk it?

 

Detroit Lions – Going on a limb here, but with that defensive line, and that offensive potential, how do they not win 10 games? They have to, right? They have the second-hardest division schedule in the NFC so that might hamper them, but if they stay healthy the potential for excellence is there.

 

AFC Division Winners

 

AFC East: New England Patriots – See Green Bay analysis above. I think they got weaker…check that, they are definitely weaker than last year. But they play in the easiest division in the history of sports. If Buffalo, Miami and the Jets didn’t have to play each other a bunch of times, they might combine for 8 wins. As it is, one of those crappy teams is going to back into 8 wins or more.

 

AFC North:  Cincinnati Bengals – Solid defensively, very strong-looking offensively, I think this is the year they take the next step. Giovanni Bernard and Tyler Eifert are going to give Andy Dalton the options apart from AJ Green he has sorely needed in order to thrive. No excuses  now.

 

AFC South: Houston Texans – Wow, the AFC sucks. I mean really. This division is only marginally better than the AFC East, and that’s because it has Jacksonville instead of the Jets. That said, Houston is a good team with a solid defense and an incredibly easy schedule. That’s a recipe for success.

 

AFC West: Denver Broncos – But not by as much as you think. They’re missing some key guys defensively early on, and the running back situation is unsettled. But once Peyton Manning gets his way, and the superior pass blocking of Knowshon Moreno is starting at tailback, they’ll be all good. For my money, Denver is as good a bet as any to represent the AFC in the Superbowl.

 

Wild Cards

 

Kansas City Chiefs – Their defense has been underrated because the inept quarterbacking kept giving up awesome field position. They addressed that with Alex Smith and all their problems will go away. Ok, not really, but the O-line, not bad to begin with, is improved with Eric Fisher, and the skill positions are talented too. They should easily get to 10 wins.

 

Baltimore Ravens – I have no doubt the defending Superbowl champs will regress. They’ve lost too much on both sides of the ball. That said, they’re still the defending champs, and until someone takes that from them, don’t count them out.

 

Awards

 

MVP:  Peyton Manning – Cop out? Maybe… but the NFL awards selection process always seems to be a bit sentimental to me. So, when a late thirties qb, two years removed from multiple neck surgeries, leads his team to the Superbowl, who else is going to get it? I couldn’t think of anyone either.

 

Defensive POY: Aldon Smith – Smith disrupts the line of scrimmage like few players have. Reggie White, in-his-prime Michael Strahan, and Warren Sapp come to mind from my lifetime. Smith is an excellent bet to threaten the single season sacks record again this year. Admittedly, this was a close call between him and JJ Watt, who is also outstanding, but Smith is on the better team that will advance farther, and will therefore likely get more recognition.

 

Offensive ROY: Eddie Lacy – Eventually, this team is going to have to protect Aaron Rodgers. And I don’t just mean block better, I mean run the ball on goal-to-go downs and cut down on the hits Rodgers takes. Lacy really looks like the guy to be the bell cow back on a good offense. That means big numbers.

 

Defensive ROY: Alec Ogletree – Ok, maybe a homer pick here, but much like Vontaze Burfict racked up the tackles for Cincy last season, I think Ogletree will put up similar numbers for a Rams defense that seems designed to free him up for pursuit. I see a couple pick-sixes for him too this season, plus there isn’t a Luke Keuchly type of player out there head and shoulders better than everyone else from his class. It’s there for Alec’s taking.

 

Coach of the Year: Andy Reid – Remember what I said about the sentimentality of the awards selection stuff? Reid is a likable guy, and is taking over a team that’s in a prime position to make a huge improvement over last year. If KC makes the playoffs, how does he NOT win?

 

Shaun’s NFC Division Winners:

 

NFC East: Dallas Cowboys – Go ahead, call me a homer, I don’t care, this is the year….again.  I hated the Frederick pick during the draft, but I am really liking it after watching him this preseason.  Brian Waters will be able to contribute on that offensive line in a couple weeks.  The Cowboys defense is going to be good, largely due to the most underrated LB in football Sean Lee.

 

NFC North: Green Bay Packers – The Packers will beat out a good Bears team this year.  The passing game cannot be questioned, and they added two really talented running backs in the draft.  The defense is ok.  The only thing that makes me nervous if I am the Packers is the offensive line.  It is terrible, and Rodgers backup QB is Seneca Wallace, who has been with the team less than a week.

 

NFC South: Atlanta Falcons – Steven Jackson is like an incredibly rich man’s version of Michael Turner.  Jackson will really help the run game, and he is an underrated receiving back, and Jaquizz is a fantastic change of pace back.  Umenyora is not a viable replacement for John Abraham, and the lack of a pass rush could hurt that secondary.  That said, I don’t think there is another team in the division that is over .500, so the Falcons will run away with the division.

 

NFC West: Seattle Seahawks – This is actually the easiest pick.  Not saying picking Seattle over San Francisco is easy, but both are going to make the playoffs, and there is a good chance it comes via tie breaker after they end the year with the same record.  If Seattle doesn’t have another losing record on the road this season (upset alert this Sunday, Carolina is better than you think and Seattle is worse on the road) then Seattle wins the division.

 

Wild Cards

 

San Francisco 49rs – I grew up hating the 49ers, and I will not ever be accused of being a fan of them, but my family does have season tickets, and I have been able to see the hype over the final year at the ‘Stick.  I don’t see them pulling off the division title, but they are still gonna win 10+ games.

 

Chicago Bears – This is tough.  I think the Lions could challenge, so could the Giants and Rams, and I think the Panthers are gonna be good this year, but in the end, the Bears will get the final Wild Card.  It looks like the offensive line isn’t terrible for the first time in about a decade, and I really think Alshon Jeffrey will establish himself as a viable #2 receiver.

 

AFC Division Winners

 

AFC East: New England Patriots – People thought the Patriots would struggle this year after losing Welker and Lloyd, seeing that Gronk is on the shelf for a few weeks, and, in case you haven’t heard, Aaron Hernandez apparently had a habit of killing people.  Don’t worry, there are four rookies that will step up in a big way this year.  Zach Sudfeld, Kenbrell Thompkins, Josh Boyce, and Aaron Dobson might be the most physically gifted rookie pass catching group to come along in some time.

 

AFC North:  Cincinnati Bengals – Gio Bernard is going to be special, Ginger Dalton has two really talented tight ends, and a superstar receiver.  The defense might be the best coached D in football under coach Zimmer.  The Bengals are going to be the cream of the AFC North crop for 5+ years to come.

 

AFC South: Houston Texans – Foster will be fine, Schaub is good enough, and DeAndre Hopkins will actually be a quality receiver opposite Andre Johnson.  Add that to a D that had JJ Watt and a division that is terrible (spoiler alert, the Colts aren’t that good) and the Texans win the division easy.

 

AFC West: Denver Broncos – DeMarius Thomas and Eric Decker weren’t enough for Peyton Manning apparently, so they went and got Wes Welker.  As much as I hate to say it, this is the best passing game in football.  Their D would get torched the first six games of this season, if two of the games didn’t come against the Raiders and the Jaguars.  The Broncos will have the best record in football, now excuse me while I go punch myself in the face for saying that.

 

Wild Cards

 

Miami Dolphins – I am a believer in Tannehill.  He reminds me a lot of Jay Cutler, and I mean that in a good way.  He has underrated mobility, he can really gun it, and makes too many mistakes.  The difference, Tannehill spent his first couple years in college as a wide receiver not a QB and has a ton of room to grow.  He will, Miller will become a viable running back, and Wallace will really stretch the field. 

 

Baltimore Ravens – This is a defense that lost Ray Lewis and Ed Reed….and got significantly better.  Yeah, I said it.  Now, the passing game will struggle some in the beginning of the season with the loss of Pitta and Boldin, but there is a 6-4 220 pound undrafted rookie named Marlon Brown who will emerge as a quality safety net over the middle for Flacco, opening up the long ball to Torrey Smith and the dump offs to the best running back duo in football.

 

Awards

 

MVP:  Tom Brady – Remember earlier when I listed the number of guys the Patriots have lost in the passing game?  Did you pick up on who they didn’t lose?  Yeah, Tom Brady.  He is going to have a great year, re-establish himself as the best QB in the NFL, and he will be able to complete touchdown passes to 10 different receivers, and more than 35 on the season with over 5,000 yards.

 

Defensive POY: Luke Kuechly – He led the NFL in tackles last year…as a rookie!  The guy has nose for the ball like nobody I have ever seen, and I truly believe he will be the leader of a defense that will contend for a Wild Card bid.  He will have 5+ picks, 3+ forced fumbles, 5+ Sacks, and 175+ tackles.  Yes, he will have the single greatest defensive season of all time.

 

Offensive ROY: Tavon Austin – The guys is special.  He has a Percy Harvin like skill set, only he is a better route runner.  Austin will touch the ball more than 100 times this year, and will have several 50+ yard touchdowns.

 

Defensive ROY:  Ezekiel Ansah – He is raw when it comes to football knowledge, but he is a freak athletically.  The first ever play he experienced in the NFL, was a pick 6…in the preseason….against Mark Sanchez.  Ok, so that isn’t really all that impressive, but his season will be.

 

Coach of the Year: Joe Philbin – The Dolphins will be in the hunt to win the division until week 14 or so, and the team will make the playoffs.  The front office has been under a lot of scrutiny this season, but leading a team like this will make it easy for Philbin to win the award, even over Andy Reid if the Chiefs make the playoffs.