Category: Uncategorized

Philadelphia Phillies 2013 Off-Season Preview

Strengths: Dominic Brown has stepped up and looks like he could be a real star for the Philadelphia Phillies for years to come. There, the strengths have been covered. Ok, maybe a bit of a pessimistic look at the team. They do still have Cole Hamels and Cliff Lee at the top of the rotation and Jonathan Papelbon to close out games. It also looks like Darin Ruf will be able to be a solid bat.

Weaknesses: Roy Halladay is gone, Jimmy Rollins, Chase Utley, and Ryan Howard aren’t the Rollins, Utley, and Howard that were at the heart of the team that dominated the NL East for years. They have no big league starters currently on their roster that are legit big league starters behind Lee and Hamels and their long time backstop Carlos Ruiz is a free agent. Cody Asche looked good late in the season at third, but he does not appear to be the future of at that position.

Off-Season Needs: The Phillies need to accept the fact they are no longer contenders and are in a rebuilding mode. Ryan Howard has a contract that makes him impossible to move, but if they can make a deal to add high minors prospects for Utley and/or Rollins, it is time to make those moves. Maikel Franco is the likely future at third base and could be on the big league roster this year, and Jesse Biddle is a legit pitcher who could break camp with the big league team, but those are really the only impact prospects that are anywhere close to big league ready. The Phillies need to add cheap veterans to fill roles this year, and make deals to bring in some young talent, otherwise they will keep the cellar warm for years.

2014 Projection: If the Phillies are not drafting in the top 10 in 2015 I will be shocked. They are the worst team in the East and they should lose 90 games in 2014.

You can follow Shaun Kernahan on twitter @shaunkernahan, add him to your network on Google, and like Shaun on Facebook.

Atlanta Braves 2013 Off-Season Preview

Strengths: Pitching, pitching, and more pitching. The Braves have an embarrassment of riches when it comes to arms. From the top of the rotation to the end of the bullpen, they were outstanding in 2013. And that was despite serious injuries to Tim Hudson, Johnny Venters, and Eric O’Flaherty. It may be a while before someone not named Clayton Kershaw wins a Cy Young Award, but that someone may be Julio Teheran. But, as they say, you need to score runs to win (not sure if they really say that, but it makes sense if you think about it). Freddie Freeman is a perennial MVP candidate, and Andrelton Simmons is the embodiment of young stud shortstop.

 

Weaknesses: Call me old fashioned, but in the era of SABRmetrics, I’m not ready to completely cast batting average aside. Sure, it’s not the be all end all measuring stick it once was, but you just can’t have too many key guys hovering around the Mendoza line and expect to come up with enough two-out run-scoring hits to win playoff series’. They were counting on big production from guys like Dan Uggla and BJ Upton, and just didn’t get it.

 

Off-Season Needs: Well, they should probably figure out the catching situation. They’ve made a qualifying offer to Brian McCann, so there’s that. If they sign him long-term, it sure turns the slugging Evan Gattis into attractive trade bait for an AL contender who could use a DH/part-time catcher. They could use him to deal with the second base issue, or as added incentive for a team to accept the catastrophic contract of Upton. And if they let Tim Hudson walk, they should probably replace his veteran leadership on the staff with someone like…oh hell, just bring Hudson back on an incentive-laden one year deal.

 

2014 Projection: NL East Champs. It’s not a tough division and despite some chinks in the armor, this is a tough team. They pitch. They field. They slug. I don’t think they’re World Series caliber at this point, but 95 wins is a very achievable goal.

Washington Nationals 2013 Off-Season Preview

Strengths:  The Washington Nationals have an excellent base on which to build upon.  Bryce Harper is a legit middle of the order bat, and rookie Anthony Rendon has a chance to be something special at either third or second base.  The top of the rotation is as good as any in baseball with Steven Strasburgh, Gio Gonzalez, and Jordan Zimmerman.

Weaknesses:  The Nationals fell victim to injury and poor pitching in the bullpen in 2013.  Denard Span is an excellent defensive center fielder, but offers just about nothing offensively.  Jason Werth showed signs of being a really good baseball player again, but he is completely inconsistent when it comes to staying healthy.  Ryan Zimmerman is the big question mark for this team.  He is a constant injury risk, and at times showed signs of the yips when throwing the ball from third base.  His future might be at first base, which would allow Rendon to move back to his natural position of third, but leave a hole at second and an asset in Adam LaRoche on the bench.  The Nationals also do not have a quality nor long term answer at catcher.

Off-Season Needs: The first need is to get this team healthy.  In terms of external help, the Nationals should go after a catcher.  They have not been shy about spending money for key free agents, so look for them to be a big player in the Brian McCann sweepstakes, but if they miss out, they could go after Jarrod Saltalamacchia.  They also need to add a pitcher or two to the back end of their rotation.

2014 Projection: It is easy to fall back into the mindset leading into the 2013 season and anoint the Nationals as World Series favorites, and while that is not where I would put them, they certainly have a shot to make it there.  I believe they are the second best team in the NL East, right behind the Atlanta Braves, and have a great shot at getting a Wild Card berth. 

You can follow Shaun Kernahan on twitter @shaunkernahan, add him to your network on Google, and like Shaun on Facebook.

Does MLB Need to Change Obstruction Rule?

In a word, maybe. After the crazy ending to Game 3 of the World Series, in which the winning run scored on a controversial obstruction call, it’s sure to be debated.

Here’s why the call by umpire Jim Joyce may have been correct. If a fielder impedes the progress of a baserunner while not in the process of attempting to field the ball, obstruction may be called. Will Middlebrooks dove to his left to try to save Jarrod Saltalamachia’s errant throw to third attempting to get Allan Craig. When the throw went into the outfield, Craig tripped over Middlebrooks while attempting to score. By all appearances, Craig would easily have beaten left fielder, Daniel Nava’s throw home. By the letter of the law, the call appears correct.

Here’s why the call may have been incorrect. Middlebrooks was inside the baseline when Craig tripped over him. Craig, therefore, was also inside the baseline. You could certainly make the argument that the fielder has the right to field his position. Also, Craig took a step inside when he rose to his feet and attempted to score, putting Middlebrooks in his path. You could also say, therefore, that Craig was at least partially to blame for the contract.

The Other Things to Consider

On the replay you could clearly see Middlebrooks raise his feet, causing Craig to trip. Nobody but Middlebrooks knows if that was intentional, or if he was simply attempting to get back to his feet. I will say this though, my wife is looking at me really funny because I just flopped down on my stomach and then tried to get back to my feet several times as quickly as I could to see if at any point in time, my feet would come up like Middlebrooks’ did. And they didn’t.

Joe Torre, MLB’s Executive VP of Baseball Operations, says the call was correct. But of course he would. Can you imagine the storm that would be brewing if he came out and said that Joyce blew the call?

The Cosmic Data

Is it karma? Was Boston sports due for retribution after the Patriots and Tom Brady benefitted from the tuck rule in 2002, allowing them to come from behind and beat the Raiders, when they certainly would have lost if not for the now defunct “rule?” Were the Cardinals due for a call of this magnitude in the World Series after the Don Denkinger, Jorge Orta, Todd Worrell call by Don Denkinger in the 1985 World Series?

Would we even be debating this if Mike Matheny hadn’t channeled his inner Don Mattingly and made two late game questionable managerial decisions by first bringing in Trevor Rosenthal in the middle of an inning, and then not pinch running for the lumbersome Yadier Molina in the ninth inning with a chance to win the game?

Hell, I don’t know. I don’t know if we’re supposed to know.

The Dodgers 2013 Season Review/Report Card

Last night, the Dodgers’ 2013 season came crashing to and end as Superman’s cape caught fire. Clayton Kershaw could not complete five innings and was tagged with seven earned runs in the loss, while counterpart Michael Wacha was dominant for Saint Louis. It’s easy to be disappointed, but a spot in the NLCS is nothing to shake a stick at. For the most part, considering all of the injuries this team sustained, they did reasonably well. The list of players who missed significant time includes Zack Greinke, Josh Beckett, Chad Billingsley, Matt Kemp, Hanley Ramirez, and Andre Ethier. That’s a few hundred million in salary worth of bandaids right there. Let’s take a look at the highs and lows:

Team MVP: Adrian Gonzalez. A Gon is no longer an elite defensive first baseman. In fact, these days, he’s probably among the worst defenders at the position. But he can still knock in some runs. He led the team with 100 ribbies and slugged 22 home runs to lead the team. Most importantly though, he was in the line up pretty much every day. At the beginning of the year, while pretty much everyone was either wounded or struggled horribly, Gonzalez held the fort down and produced. One of the often overlooked things about him is that you can’t really play matchups with him, as he hits lefties just about as well as he does righties. His power may not be what it once was, but he still figures to be productive for seasons to come. Grade: B+

Team Cy Young: Clayton Kershaw. Gee, that one was tough to call, wasn’t it… If not for pathetic run support, especially early on in the year, Kershaw could have won 25 games. His sub 2.00 era for the year led the majors by quite a margin, and he is unquestionably the best pitcher in baseball. Whatever contract extension he eventually signs this off season could be worth upwards of 200 million dollars. And if you judge him by his peers, he’s worth every penny. Grade: A+

Unsung Hero: Juan Uribe. Uribe was an afterthought as the season started. Still on the roster by virtue of his popularity in the clubhouse (and possibly the 8 million guaranteed he was earning) he had this one chance to save his career. Yeah, and that’s pretty much what he did. Taking over at third base for the ineffective, and eventually released Luis Cruz, Uribe played exceptional defense and contributed solidly at the plate with 12 home runs while hitting .278. Those numbers may appear solid if unremarkable, but considering he was below the Mendoza line in 2012 and barely above it in 2011, it was borderline miraculous. If the decision making process was objective, Uribe would win a gold glove. The award will probably go to a bigger name like Ryan Zimmermann or David Wright, superior hitters but not the defenders they once were, but anyone who watched the Dodgers this year knows who really deserves it. Grade: A-

Rookie of the Year: Hyun Jin Ryu. This one was a bit tougher to call, as Yasiel Puig’s emergence undoubtedly turned the season around for the Blue Crew. But while Puig faltered down the stretch, making more and more boneheaded decisions in the field, and striking out with shocking regularity at the plate, Ryu remained steady and effective. He won 14 games, and if not for an irrelevant tune up start at the end of the season in which he gave up 4 earned runs while just getting some work in, he’d have finished with a sub 3.00 era also. And in the biggest game of the season to that point, he out-dueled the brilliant Adam Wainwright in game 3 of the NLCS with seven dominant shut out innings. Grade: A

Biggest Disappointment: Matt Kemp. When you have the tools to be a perennial MVP candidate, much is expected of you. After a monstrous 2011 campaign, Kemp had a rough go of it in 2012, struggling at the plate and in the field while dealing with a myriad of nagging injuries, and one that required a shoulder operation. Early this year, it clearly wasn’t 100% right, despite Kemp’s repeated arguments that it was. Well, if you say it’s right, then we expect performance as if it’s right. And he didn’t perform that way. And to tie a brutal knot on the season for him, he injured his ankle on a play at the plate due to lack of hustle. That’s criminal. Grade: D

Offense: Again, injuries played a part, but with their line up top to bottom, you would have expected that this team scored more runs. Gonzalez led the team with only 22, which about the total to be expected from him at this point in the season, but you could argue that this team could field five 30 home run hitters at once, with a couple of them threatening to reach 40. But, it’s hard to hit them when you’re not in the line up. Regardless, this team had to scratch runs together too much, rather than getting heaps at a time with more power production. And with Carl Crawford stealing a measly 15 bags at the top of the lineup, this lineup is was not equipped to manufacture runs. They needed to slug them home with doubles and round trippers. And they didn’t. That said, some guys had nice years and performed better than expected, like the aforementioned Uribe, and the underrated AJ Ellis once again exceeded expectations by hitting 10 home runs. Grade: C+

Pitching: Well, Kershaw was once again awesome. Greinke, even though he just signed a massive contract, probably deserves an extension already. Not only did he pitch brilliantly all year after missing most of the first six weeks, he showed that he’s a tough guy who protects his hitters. The guys standing in the batters box for you night in and night out like it when you do that. We’ve already established the nice year that Ryu had. Kenley Jansen showed he is a top closer, late season acquisition Brian Wilson showed he has plenty left in the tank, and JP Howell was quietly excellent all year as well. Paco Rodriguez and Ronald Belisario faltered late after pitching well for the most part, and Josh Beckett was a disappointment but injuries probably exacerbated that. All things considered, 2014 looks bright for this group. Grade: A-

Defense: This wasn’t expected to be a strength for this team so the fact that it wasn’t is not a surprise. AJ Ellis was elite at throwing runners out, though he still allows too many passed balls. Uribe was probably the best defensive third baseman in the majors this year, but everywhere else was between mediocre and terrible. Hanley Ramirez, considered a poor defender, was probably better than poor. Andre Ethier, who filled in for the injured Kemp in center, played hard, if not that well. Nobody else, even the highly regarded Mark Ellis, did anything noteworthy. Grade: C

Coaching: Yes, the part we’ve all been waiting for. Don Mattingly, despite taking the team to the NLCS, proved incapable of making a good decision. Look, sometimes you can make the right decision and things go wrong. That’s fine, and should not be held against the manager. But things like overusing relievers, dodgy substitutions, and an incomprehensible batting order can be. Mattingly did do a decent job with the immature Puig, and finally made the smart move of eliminating Brandon League as closer in favor of the better Jansen, but the bad far outweighs the good. However, Rick Honeycutt continues to show he is one of baseball’s better pitching coaches, and deserves a long term contract extension. Tim Wallach and Davey Lopes both contributed as coaches. Nothing to say, really, on Trey Hillman. As Mattingly’s right hand guy, one of his primary responsibilities is helping the manager avoid dumb decisions. Either he didn’t take that responsibility seriously, or inexplicably agreed with Mattingly. Grade: C (nudged there by the excellent Honeycutt; without him, it’s probably a D-)

Front Office: Ned Colletti has been a popolar target for critics. And you can’t really blame them. Look at the ridiculous Brandon League contract, and a bench that’s loaded with utility infielders. Seriously, who needs five utility infielders!!!??? But, he did get team MVP Gonzalez and Carl Crawford for very little. Same with Hanley. And he got ace 1A Greinke in the off season to round out the staff. Not every decision was good, but he spent the money he was given and this team was good enough to win with better coaching and maybe a little luck. The team may want to take a look at it’s scouting department. They’ve found a few gems (Puig, Rodriguez) in the past couple of years, but the farm system looks pretty barren. Grade: C+

2014 Outlook: Well, most key players will be back. They will still have four starting outfielders for three spots, but given the injuries of the past couple of years, that’s not a bad thing. Mark Ellis, Uribe, and Brian Wilson are free agents, and played key roles. Uribe might be back on a one year deal, and they’ll probably try to resign Wilson, but they will need to figure out second base. Some people are clamoring for Robinson Cano, but do they want to spend the reported 300 million dollars Cano wants? More likely, they try speedster Dee Gordon there, or try to work a deal with the crosstown Halos for Howie Kendrick. A repeat NL West crown is probable, but the team will have to be healthy to compete with a team like the Cardinals, the unquestioned cream of the crop in the National League. 100-62 is my guess.

Dodgers Look to Stay Alive Behind Greinke

This year’s NLCS has certainly had its share of drama. You can usually count on at least one one-sided blow out per playoff series, but it just hasn’t happened here yet. Don’t look for it to start today.

The Dodgers need a win today to keep their season alive, and they’ll look to Zack Greinke for a repeat of his masterful 8 inning performance in Game 1. If the Dodgers are going to win, they’ll need lights out pitching to overcome their injury stricken lineup’s inability to hit and Don Mattingly’s inability to manage.

But let’s be fair, Mattingly has not done everything wrong this series, just most things. One of the scant few decisions he’s gotten right is riding Greinke for 8 innings in Game 1, after an entire season of pulling starters not named Kershaw after 6 innings and inserting the ghost of Ronald Belisario. Greinke will be going on regular rest today so there is no reason to think fatigue will play any factor.

The question is, can they manage to scratch a couple of runs together off of the talented Joe Kelly? The answer to that question is, most likely not. To give themselves the best shot of doing so, Mattingly will have to change the batting order, which would be a good decision, so you can bet every last penny you have in the bank that it won’t happen. But, because I’m a masochist, I’ll throw it out there anyway. Step one, move Yasiel Puig to the two spot in front of Adrian Gonzalez. That way, the youngster is protected a little bit. That moves Mark Ellis down to the 7th spot, not as a demotion, but because that’s where his and AJ Ellis’ plate discipline will be best served. Draw some walks and turn that lineup around to give the big hitters more chances.

It all, of course, goes out the window if Hanley and Ethier are unable to go. But in the case that they aren’t, Mattingly should go with Scott Van Slyke and Michael Young rather than Skip Schumaker and Nick Punto…which of course he won’t because he’s incapable of making a smart call by anything other than luck. Van Slyke and Young are the superior offensive players in this equation, and while you’re sacrificing defense, defense is not what the problem has been for the Blue Crew this series.

Am I being too hard on Mattingly? I don’t know, you tell me. He’s the guy who made Brandon League his closer the first quarter of the season.

What do the Cards need to do to win? Well, getting a repeat performance from Kelly would be a good start. He’s young and a bit excitable, but doesn’t cave under pressure so another 6 solid innings isn’t a stretch. Offensively, they’ll need to make Greinke work harder than they did in Game 1. Greinke has a mechanically sound, repeatable delivery, resulting in good command and a lot of first pitch strikes. They swung at a lot of first and early count pitches in Game 1, allowing Greinke to breeze through 8 innings.

If they can work some counts early, even if it means passing on some hittable pitches, they might run his pitch count up to where he could be out of the game after 6 innings. That will put Mattingly in a spot where he’ll have to make important decisions, tilting the scale hugely in favor of Matheny and the Cards.

What’s ultimately going to happen? Heck, I don’t know. I may be going with my heart over my head here, but I think the Dodgers take a close one 3-1. Greinke will be excellent and the bullpen will bend but not break for an inning or two. Meanwhile, a solid effort by Kelly will be just not quite enough, and the series goes back to Saint Louis for Game 6.

Oh, and while I’m at it, we take Game 6 also. I’m unbelievably impressed by what Michael Wacha has been able to do for the Cards down the stretch and in the playoffs, but I don’t think he’ll out duel Clayton Kershaw twice.

Sorry, Dodger fans. That’s where the fairy tale ends. The Cards will take Game 7, as I also don’t think that Hyun Jin Ryu can out duel the brilliant Adam Wainwright twice.

What do you think, did I get it right? If not, I’ll say Shaun spiked my Sprite.

Are You The Fantasy Football Impulse Buyer?

Fantasy football is probably the simplest of all the fantasy sports. In baseball, you have pitching and hitting categories. Anything from a hit by pitch to a single to a stolen base to a hold to WHIP and dozens of other things contribute or affect your score. In basketball it’s rebounds, points, foul shot percentage, steals, etc. In hockey, goals, assists, plus minus and a crapload of goalie stats. Football, it gives us yards gained, touchdowns, and field goals. And of course, the 7 or 8 points you’re hoping to squeeze out of your defense if you weren’t the guy that went way early on Seattle or San Francisco.

What this essentially means is that you have fewer players that will actually contribute to your score. Whereas in baseball, hockey and basketball, every player in the game is a potential fantasy contributor in some way or another. With football, you have a significant number of the players on the field at a given time who will have no direct impact on your team’s point total at the end of the week. There’s also only one game a week, making what a player on your team does during that game all the more critical. In baseball, if your stud first baseman has an off game and goes 0-4, he has five or six more to more than make up for it with a couple of bombs and bathtub full of RBIs. Sidney Crosby might not have picked up any points for you on, say, Monday, but if he hangs a four pointer with a plus 3 on Thursday, you’re still in the black. D Wade turns an ankle on Sunday and plays only 9 minutes, the previous three games he played that week still count.

Come Sunday (assuming the Thursday game didn’t have all of your players in it), you better have your best available guys in. This is the one shot you have to get maximum points. You’re not cycling guys in and out on a daily basis based on who has a game that day. You are looking at your approximately 5 running backs, 5 receivers and maybe 2 tight ends (if you don’t have a Jimmy Graham type) and trying to figure out which 2 backs, 2 receivers, 1 tight end, and one flex is going to give you the best numbers. That’s a lot of pressure! Not in the large scheme of things, but look at it. End up with more points from guys you left on the bench than the guys you put in the lineup and you will likely come up on the short end of the week’s match up.

At the risk of over simplifying, this makes a fantasy football draft more vital than all of the other sports. There aren’t a bunch of minor league studs who were high draft picks a couple of years back, waiting for their shot while you wait to snag them from the waiver wire. In football, high draft picks in football usually play immediately, meaning they’re drafted. Then you have guys who generate preseason buzz. Those are the guys who go late in fantasy drafts as flyers. Most fail to have a fantasy impact. Even fewer guys than that end up being contributors from the waiver wire. Sure, every now and again, an unheralded rookie like Alfred Morris or Arian Foster who was a sixth rounder or no rounder respectively, ends up being a huge find. But almost never do you find a veteran on the waiver wire who suddenly becomes a big fantasy contributor. Sure, guys have huge games sometimes. Nearly 100% of the time, it’s a fluke. Look at Kevin Oglegree last year. Massive game. Huge waiver wire scramble for him. Months of major suckage afterward.  

So, now let me ask you. Did you run out and get Willis McGahee, Brandon Jacobs, or Harry Douglas from the waiver wire? Sure, McGahee is a starter now in Cleveland. Jacobs in New York. Douglas in Atlanta. McGahee was declining anyway when he suffered a knee injury last year with Denver. Jacobs ended up being an afterthought in San Francisco last year. Douglas, despite having some talent, has been a tease in Atlanta for seasons. Did you run out and get one or more of these guys?

If you did, that could mean one of two things. Either your team is so decimated by injuries that you are desperate for any player that has even an outside chance at producing, or you drafted so poorly that any of these guys represent an upgrade over the guys you have.

Or it could mean a third thing. You’re a fantasy impulse buyer. You see a name you recognize suddenly relevant again in pro football and you frantically grab them off the wire. Then you probably do a giddy little dance and brag to the rest of your league about how you got them.

The silver lining here is that you are salvagable. You can be fixed. All you have to do is channel all of your enthusiasm for washed up or never-will-be veterans into rookies that at least have a chance of turning into something. Will McGahee grab a score every now and then to mask his 40 yard or so production? Of course. In fact, Jacobs just had a nice game against Chicago on Thursday. STAY AWAY FROM HIM! It won’t happen again. Sure, Douglas will catch the odd touchdown from Matty Ice. It happens. But are you really benching guys like Torrey Smith, Eric Decker, Anquan Boldin, DeSean Jackson, Cecil Shorts, etc. to put him in your line up? Why did I choose those names? Because they are all wide receivers who were very likely NOT the first or second one you chose in your draft, but are viable fantasy producers. Think about it. If a guy has either always sucked, or is well into a pattern of decline and perpetual suckage, it isn’t likely to change. Your odds are much better taking a crack at a guy like Zac Stacy. Sure the Rams suck, but he’s starting now. And he’s a rookie, so there isn’t anything to say that he can’t be the next Alfred Morris or Arian Foster, whereas there is everything to say that Jacobs, McGahee and Douglas will continue to be every bit the irrelevant fantasy entities they have either always been or have been steadily heading towards.

As always, good luck this week…unless of course you are playing against me. 🙂

The Government Could Learn a Thing of Two from Baseball

I am as far from politically plugged in as it gets, but I am already sick of this government shutdown crap.  Now, how can I rant about it here on The Stain, ah, easy, cause it reminds me a ton of the 1994 baseball strike.

Flashback to August of 1994, me, having just turned 9, had lived up to my word of several years prior and went on my first flight sans parents.  I flew out to the East coast to spend a week and a half with my grandfather and great-grandfather.  I had long looked forward to my first game at Fenway Park, but something happened, baseball suddenly shut down, and Fenway Park was not hosting any more baseball games that year.

Earlier, that spring, I had read a book for my 3rd grade book report about Ken Griffey Jr., and I was watching a historical season come to an end with him sitting at 40 home runs, on pace to set the single season home run record had they played the final 51 games of the season.

It was the first time since World War II there was no World Series.  Something we all take for granted was taken away from us, all because people whose salaries are paid for by people like you and me, couldn’t get together and come to a mutual decision.

Sound familiar?  Yup, a bunch of people in Washington, who have jobs because they have been elected to do said job, can’t sit down and figure out a budget.  So, places people travel across the country to visit, be it a national park or a monument in D.C. are closed, just as Fenway Park was closed 19 years ago.  The son of a military man can’t go to the doctor because military health insurance has been suspended, something that nobody thought would go away, just as nobody thought we would go without a World Series leading into the 1994 baseball season.

Baseball hit a major low in the seasons following the 1994 work stoppage, and it took two men taking performance enhancing drugs, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa, to get the public interest back to baseball.  Let’s just hope it doesn’t take drastic measures like that to get the government running again.

You can follow Shaun Kernahan on twitter @shaunkernahan, add him to your network on Google, and like Shaun on Facebook.

Did Juan Uribe Save Don Mattingly’s Job?

It looks that way, doesn’t it? Let’s be fair, Don Mattingly probably deserves to be a manager. Not of a team like the Dodgers with bottomless pockets and perennial World Series aspirations. But probably somewhere. In the awful Frank McCourt era, he worked hard with a cobbled together roster and probably got better results than anyone could have really hoped for. In 2013, with a star-studded roster, the list of things he did right is a short one. One was how he handled Cuban sensation Yasiel Puig’s transition to the big leagues. The other was giving maligned third baseman, Juan Uribe another shot.

From his complete mismanagement of the bullpen, to his incomprehensible lineup and batting order changes, to his chronic disastrous late inning decision making, there isn’t a person in baseball who probably deserved to lose his job more than Mattingly. If you didn’t know better, you’d swear he was intentionally making the worst possible decision in some sort of sick experiment to see if his team could win anyway.

But with one swing of the bat that almost never happened, it all changed. After two failed attempts to bunt Puig, who had led of Game 4’s bottom of the 8th inning with a double, over to third, Uribe hit the most significant Dodger home run since Kirk Gibson’s 1988 moment of magic against Dennis Eckersley… or arguably Steve Finley’s division clinching grand slam. Gone was the stench of the awful decision to bring in Ronald Belisario in the top of the 7th, who was so bad down the stretch that he should have been left off the postseason roster in favor of, believe it or not, Carlos Marmol. Yeah, the same Carlos Marmol that was picked off of Chicago’s scrap heap and was even reasonably effective as the season wound down. Forgotten, if only briefly, was his criminal overuse of Paco Rodriguez, resulting in one of the league’s best left-handed relievers becoming a veritable batting practice tosser in games that matter. History was his unconscionable reluctance to go veteran JP Howell in high leverage situations, despite Howell’s lengthy track record of excellence with Tampa Bay in a tough AL East division. Swept under the rug was leaving ace Clayton Kershaw in Game 1 for more than 120 pitches despite a huge lead and the very real possibility (and ultimately reality) that Kershaw would come back for Game 4 on short rest.

But it almost never happened. Because, you see, Mattingly was having Uribe bunt Puig over. Bunt. Uribe, apart from Hanley Ramirez, had been the team’s best hitter down the stretch. After a meteoric beginning, Puig struggled in September. Adrian Gonzalez wore down, and while still productive, only hit a handful of home runs the last two months. Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier battled injuries. It was Uribe who really steadied the ship. Always a solid defender, he was spectacular at third base. Streaky for most of his career, he remained consistent down the stretch. Overly aggressive for his entire career, he showed patience, resulting in a career high on base percentage. And for you SABR metric lovers, his WAR was better than Ryan Zimmermann, and only a little worse than David Wright, the two benchmarks for NL third basemen.

Fortunately, David Carpenter’s 96 mile per hour fastballs are not easy to bunt, and Uribe, a pretty competent bunter in limited sample sizes, was only able to foul them off. Had he successfully gotten the bunt down, it would have been up to Skip Schumaker and AJ Ellis to knock Puig in from third. And while there’s no way to tell what would have happened, if their at bats against Carpenter were any indication, it wouldn’t have happened. But it didn’t have to, because one of the Dodgers’ hottest hitters could now forget about the idiotic bunt plan and swing away. And the rest was history.

Now, instead of being on the job hunt, where by all rights he should be, Don Mattingly is “leading” his team in the NLCS. It’s funny how little things make such a big difference. It’s inevitable that Mattingly, who is quite intelligent but whose IQ seems to drop by 100 points every time an important decision needs to be made in the course of a baseball game, will remind us again soon of why he really isn’t fit to manage a team with championship hopes.

But for now, that’s all forgotten.

5 of the Most Overrated Head Coaches/Managers in Sports

Let’s all just be honest with one another. A coach or manager’s job, while difficult in an application sense, has a pretty simple description. Put your team in the best possible position to have a chance at winning the game, and pretty much stay out of the way. This means you game plan, strategize, encourage, discipline, train, cheer, substitute, and face the media. But essentially, it’s the players that have to play the game, and why the teams that win championships at the end of the year are the teams that have a preponderance of the best players, not a bunch of scrubs with a great manager. However, time and time again, you see teams with an abundance of talent that consistently underachieve. Often, the finger can be pointed to sub par (or incompetent, if we’re speaking truthfully) leadership.

Who the hell are you, Torsten? What makes you the authority on good coaching and lousy coaching? Good question, I suppose. I can only say this: I’m a guy with an opinion. I guy that observes. And in three and a half decades of watching sports on a daily basis (sorry, ladies, I’m married), I’ve seen a lot of great, good, bad, and ugly. And most often, what looks like a duck and quacks like a duck turns out to be a duck.

Remember one thing before we continue. This column contains the word “overrated” in the title. This isn’t to imply that the coaches/managers mentioned herein should be unemployed. It just means they’re constantly having praise heaped upon them by fawning and starstruck members of the media when the reality is, they’re far from the best in their profession. Some of the names may surprise you, and I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if you disagreed with me. It would only mean that you’re wrong. That’s fine. Without further ado.

Phil Jackson – What’s he won, eleven NBA Championships as a coach? Wow, he must be the greatest coach ever!!! I bet you think you know what’s coming. Anyone can coach Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen to titles. No, no. BUT, as we determined earlier, championship teams generally have the best players. Let’s look at the last few championships across sports. Who has won them? The Blackhawks, The Heat, The Cardinals, Manchester United, Baltimore Ravens, Novak Djokovic. These are teams with some of the greatest talent collections in their sport in the World, or in Novak Djokovic’s case, the most talented player currently playing. So it stands to reason that a team with players like Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen, Dennis Rodman, Steve Kerr, Toni Kukoc, etc. would have a reasonable shot at winning a title, right? You could say the same for the Lakers of the Kobe Bryant Shaquille O’Neil era. In Jackson’s case, his shortcomings really come to light when you see him in instances where hurdles and challenges had to be overcome.

Let’s go back to 2011. The Lakers were coming off of back-to-back championships and expectations for a third were high. The roster was stacked. Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, pre-substance abuse issue Lamar Odom, Andrew Bynum, and Ron Artest. But something happened. Dallas coach Rick Carlisle and his team saw something, a way to break down the Lakers’ defense and a way to combat their triangle offense. What they did was put the onus on the Lakers to make an adjustment, and in four games they never did. As each game moved closer and closer to a loss, cameras repeated focused on Jackson and all he could do was stare wide-eyed and sullenly at the court. He literally had no answers. Now, could he have tried a different approach, changed things up at half time in a desperate attempt to reverse the course of the game and get his team back in it, and still have failed? Of course. But the point is, he had nothing. He has the triangle offense, which wasn’t even invented by him. That was Tex Winter. And when that isn’t working, he had the two greatest one-on-one players in the history of the game in Bryant and MJ whom he would look to to just take over. JJ Barea, Dallas’ tiny point guard in this series was nearly unstoppable. Did they try to neutralize him by posting him up when on offense and get him in foul trouble? Did they attack the offensively brilliant but defensively vulnerable Dirk Nowitzki at all? Did they try any real drive and kick to free up their sharp shooters? No. Is there a guarantee that any of it would have worked? Of course not. But we’ll never know, because the thought of attempting to change it up never crossed his mind, evidently. Carlisle turns out to be a master strategist, as you can see how the Mavs shocked everyone by toppling Miami and LeBron James. And Eric Spoelstra DID try to change things up, and the Mavs just won. Jackson, he’s just, well, a Zen Master I suppose. He does have a way of nurturing harmony, excising petulance in young stars, and manipulating referees. He’s not the worst coach in the world, and would deserve to have a job if he was looking for one, but is he the best like everyone is so quick to anoint him? Not even close. Need more proof? He started Smush Parker at point guard in MULTIPLE NBA games. Smush Parker. And 97-year-old Derek Fisher. Seriously. Started. Games that mattered.

Jeff Fisher – After a positively mediocre tenure in Tennessee, highlighted by one Superbowl appearance despite a talented roster with a lock-down defense for much of his career there, Fisher took his talents to St. Louis, after some time off. The Savior of St. Louis football, they screamed. The Rams finally had that coach to lead them out of a decade that was one of the worst in professional sports history. So in comes Fisher, in comes a new general manager, and the Rams immediately improve by 5 wins, including impressive performances twice against the 49rs and twice against the vaunted Seahawks, including in a losing effort on the last day of the season in Seattle, where no team but the Seahawks won a game last year. The Fisher Effect, they called it. See? All this team needed was a coach who knew his ass from a hole in the ground, a bit of a roster overhaul to get rid of the excess baggage, and a personnel department that actually knew what a football was. Sure, all of that helped a little. It also helped that the Rams had sucked for so long, every team expected a walk-over when they saw St. Louis on their schedule. They weren’t used to a Rams team that had a roster of over 50 NFL players instead of 12 NFL players and over 40 pretenders. In the midst of all this improvement, however, was a disturbing pattern. Fisher is incredibly predictable.

Most NFL coaches add wrinkles to their playbook and play calling as the weeks go on. They incorporate new things, review tapes from previous weeks to make sure that they aren’t giving things away by falling into too much of a pattern. By all appearances though, you would think Fisher looks at game tape and thinks, We absolutely must find what was a total disaster last week, and do that on every play this week. Of course that’s not the case, but look at the tape. Look at the highlights. Not only does Fisher, much like Jackson, seem painfully unable to attempt any kind of adjustments when things aren’t working, he consistently calls plays with incredibly low probability of being successful. On top of that, even, he makes the defense defend only the minimum part of the field.

Allow me to digress for a moment into football philosophy 101. A football field is 120 yards long counting both endzones, and just over 53 yards wide (we’re going to round down because math…well, math is hard.) The maximum distance a defensive team will ever be responsible for is just under 110 yards since they don’t defend the end zone they’re trying to score into. That’s 5,830 square yards of field to defend. Since the average quarterback can probably throw the ball 60 yards past the line of scrimmage (just to use a round number because math…well, I’m just not very good at it.) you can postulate that the defense will be responsible for actively defending 3,180 yards at a given time, provided there’s enough field left to defend. That works out to just under 55% of the field. 11 guys have to defend that vast expanse of field. It’s not much of a surprise that it’s an offensive league these days, is it? Well, Fisher and his braintrust simply refuse to attempt any pass play more than 8 yards down the field. Despite Sam Bradford attempting more passes than any quarterback in the league so far this year, his passes travel an average of something like 6.7 yards in the air. (we’re going to round up to ten because math… I’m running out of math jokes.) When the defense knows with near certainty that any play attempted is going to be less than ten yards from the line of scrimmage, it means they only have to be responsible for 530 square yards. That’s only 9% of the field. And the actuality is more like 7% because we rounded up. There’s an entire formulaic process that goes way more in depth than this, and I think I’m going to write about it at a later date, because I’m still shocked about the fake punt attempt against the Cowboys two weeks ago. The probability of that play on fourth and 8 had maybe a 5% chance of success where a regular old “let’s go for it” play on fourth down sat around 35%, even with Fisher’s unwillingness to try pass plays of longer than 7 yards. Anyway, moving on.

Can some of Fisher’s futility be blamed on an offensive coordinator who is completely inept, and a defensive coordinator who appears far out of his depth, and a personnel department that somehow looks every bit as incompetent as the previous regime, demonstrating shocking profligacy with high draft picks and head scratching idiocy with free agent signings?  Sure. But since Fisher has input in those decisions too, he really is mostly to blame for how God awful of a team he has. There’s still hope for him though. To be fair, he has the reputation of being a likable guy and player’s coach, that his guys like him, play hard for him, and will do what he says. Now, he just has to say things that aren’t moronic.

Joe Torre – Torre’s 12 year stint as Yankee manager is still reasonably fresh in most people’s minds, and his defenders will vehemently shout that he led the pinstripes to the postseason each of his seasons in charge, and won 4 World Series titles with the Yanks. A closer look though reveals that during the Yanks’ run of three straight titles, and four of five, they had such an advantage over the rest of the MLB field that it’s shocking they won only four with Torre in charge. Bottomless coffers allowed them to sign any player they wanted, and George Steinbrenner’s complete disregard for the luxury tax reinforced that. Yet somehow, after 2000, this team just couldn’t make it happen in the postseason. Sure, there was the heartbreaking loss to Arizona on Luis Gonzales’ duck snort single off of Mo Rivera. But really, none of it should be a surprise. Why? Because Torre treated his bullpen like sweatshop workers. Scott Proctor, Paul Quantrill, Ramiro Mendoza, Luis Vizcaino, Joba Chaimberlain, Ron Villone. He found one or two guys not named Mariano in his bullpen that were throwing reasonably well, and pitched them in what seemed like every game. That goes great, and all, for the first few months of the season, but when the post season rolls around and your top relievers have already thrown nearly 100 innings, they’re spent. Especially when you consider how many times they must have gotten up in the pen to warm up but never actually entered the game. In some cases, these guys recovered by the next year and pitched well, or ok… until September anyway. In other cases, like Scott Proctor, he was never the same. His arm was toast, and by the time he was on the Dodgers (along with Torre, incidentally) he was cooked. Joba Chaimberlain and his malevolent arsenal of pitches was one of baseball’s biggest future stars. But years later and still a Yankee, he’s mediocre at best. The trend continued when Torre took over the Dodgers. Veteran Chan Ho Park, still with excellent stuff but a delicate body, was run into the ground and was essentially useless down the stretch. It’s a miracle that Mariano Rivera never had arm problems in his career, and I’m firmly convinced it’s only because he hasn’t thrown a breaking ball in 15 years. That’s the only reason I can think of that Mo survived Torre’s overuse.

Now, is this because Torre just hated relievers? Was it trust issues, as he alluded to in his memoir/autobiography, The Yankee Years (featuring also the outstanding Tom Verducci)? Unless I’m way off, bullpen guys who aren’t closers have always seemed to me to be treated kind of like the kicker or punter of a football team. Yeah, they’re kind of necessary to have around, but they’re not really treated like the other guys on the team. Anyone remember Tony Cogan? He was a promising lefty in the Royals organization who made his major league debut in 2000. Cogan got off to a good start, but faltered and was demoted. Allegedly, Cogan told a coach on the team that his arm was hurting and was told, paraphrased, you’re a piece of meat to us and your job is to go in there and pitch when we tell you to.

I got that story years ago from someone close to Cogan, and at the time, to me too. Was that Torre’s philosophy also? Relievers are interchangeable parts that, much like brake pads, should just be discarded when worn too thin, replaced by shiny new ones? Nothing would indicate that. I’ve scoured the internet from top to bottom looking for any possible instance of Torre hearing from a reliever, “Coach, my arm is hanging, I don’t think I have it today,” and Torre firing back, “Awww, you’re arm is hanging? Well, here’s a nice warm glass of shut the @#$% up and get out there and pitch.” I didn’t find any. So rather than disregard for the human being, it can only be a lack of ability to comprehend that throwing a baseball overhand is not a natural motion, and that the arms that do it fatigue eventually.

Want a simpler reason why Torry is overrated? He’s won 53% of the games he’s managed in his career, counting the 12 seasons he was with the Yankees and their highest-in-sport payroll. Joe Girardi inherited an older version of that team with stiffer AL East competition and has won 57% of his games as manager.

Roberto Martinez – Long considered one of soccer’s brightest managerial rising stars, Martinez currently plies his trade with Everton in the English Premier League. Before that, he was with since-relegated Wigan Athletic, and before that, since-PROMOTED Swansea. So let’s get this straight, he leaves Swansea for Wigan, and then Swansea gets promoted to the top flight. Wigan eventually gets relegated a couple seasons later. Again, he leaves a place and they improve. He joins a place and they regress.

Martinez is not an incompetent soccer mind. He actually has ideas. He doesn’t just throw 4-4-2 formations on the field and hope for the best. He wants his team to play with style, attack, control the ball, and possess a bit of panache. It makes for entertaining soccer, that’s for sure. But is it effective?

Wigan Athletic is a tiny team when compared to others in the Premier League. To attempt to play the same style of soccer as Manchester United or Arsenal with 1/100th of the budget, not to mention even a smaller percentage than that of appeal to potential players, is lunacy. To compare Wigan to Stoke City, a similarly small team in the top flight who has consistently battled for and secured mid-table security, is as close to fair as I can come. Stoke’s philosophy is simple. Turn their home stadium (The Brittania) into a fortress, defend resolutely, and be effective on set pieces. For years, the Wigan philosophy was the same. When they first came up under manager Paul Jewell, they held a hard line with rugged defenders, Arjan De Zeeuw, Stephane Henchoz, and Matt Jackson. Later on with Steve Bruce, it was the same with the burly Titus Bramble, towering Paul Scharner, and other notable tough guys, Kevin Kilbane and Emerson Boyce. Fast forward to the Martinez era, their defensive players included Boyce, Antolin Alcaraz, Maynor Figueroa, and Gary Caldwell. These guys have one thing in common, and it’s that they’re tough guys who are willing to do the dirty work. Yet Martinez insisted that these guys, ill-skilled to do so, play their way out of trouble in the back rather than hammer the ball to safety. And predictably, Wigan’s defense was among the league’s leakiest for Martinez’ entire tenure in Wigan.

It reminds me of when my dad was my AYSO coach. My dad played soccer at pretty high levels in Germany, South Africa, and eventually here in the States with the Hollywood Kickers and Hollywood Stars. Anyone who knows anything about AYSO knows that generally speaking, each team ends up with a few good players, a handful of decent players, a couple mediocre ones, a bad one or two, and one or two kids who are so out of place on a soccer field that it’s evident their parents just wanted a babysitter for a couple hours a week. One of these kids was Sean V., a nice kid…and really really overweight. Sean could barely run but AYSO rules made you play him somewhere for half the game, so my dad slotted him in at right fullback and prayed. Valiantly, my dad attempted to teach Sean and the other kids how to control the ball at the back and play it to a teammate, rather than just boot it. Some of the kids got it a little bit, but Sean repeatedly fell on the ball, had it hit him in the nutsack, deflected it into the path of an onrushing opposing forward, just about everything bad that you could imagine. Finally, my dad gave up and told Sean, “Buddy, forget the control and pass thing. If you have that ball come to you, give it good whack back up the field.” Sean cheerily replied, “No problem, coach!” And you know what, it worked. No, Sean did not all of a sudden become a good soccer player, or a good defender. But about 90% of the calamities he committed on the field went away, and more often than not, when the ball came to him, he successfully slugged it back where it came from.

The moral of the story is this. You can’t shoehorn your philosophy into a roster that is ill-equipped to handle it. You can pick certain guys who are good fits, and install pieces of it. You can have your attackers take creative approaches and try inventive things because if they foul it up, it’s no big thing. But you can’t take a collection of tough guys who are best at and used to hard-nosed defending and turn them into Franz Beckenbauer. It just doesn’t work that way. He’s off to a good start at Everton, but it’s a small sample size so far so we shall see.

Dusty Baker – The real shocker here is that Baker continues to be employed by teams that should contend. Take this year’s Reds, how could that team not perform better? Big time hitters, a legitimate pitching staff with a legitimate ace and a big time closer, yet they squeaked into the wild card game…and lost. Somehow, Baker managed to work it out so that Mat Latos, the team’s best starter, couldn’t pitch the biggest game of the year, and decided to give the ball to Johnny Cueto, who although talented, spent most of the season on the DL with lat issues. It’s easy to speak in hindsight, but you know, veteran Bronson Arroyo was there too.

That’s just the most recent example. While with the Cubs, he managed to put together a couple of good seasons, but in the process, managed to destroy Kerry Wood and Mark Prior, two of the most talented right handed pitchers to come along in generations. Is it all his fault? Probably not. In Prior’s case, alleged steroid use may have had something to do with it. But both guys threw incredibly hard with ridiculous sliders, one of the pitches that is hardest on the arm. When guys like that are at the top of the league in pitch count per start, isn’t there something wrong? Look, I don’t buy completely into pitch count, but guys that throw 40+ 90mph sliders per start should probably be monitored a little bit, no?

Additionally, I’m not all in on Moneyball like some guys, but I’m also not dismissive of on base percentage. Sure, I’d rather have a guy that has a higher batting average (sure, call me old fashioned) because that guy is more likely to get a hit with two outs and a guy in scoring position, where a walk won’t really accomplish anything. However, let’s go back to this year’s Reds. When you have sluggers like Joey Votto and Jay Bruce (to say nothing of the very good Brandon Phillips), how is OBP not a priority at the top of the line up?

I’m not saying that Baker has nothing offer as a manager. Put him in charge of a young team that isn’t necessarily expected to compete, and let him teach those players something. He was, after all, a very good player who always gave his best. And he’s not completely useless when it comes to decision-making, just when the health of his pitching staff and the production of his offense is at stake. Ok… so he is kind of useless. But he can still teach young players a thing or two about playing the game. Apart, of course, from “toothpicks being an excellent source of protein.”

Did I miss anyone? Let me know in the comments. Coming soon, the other side of the coin. Coaches who are underappreciated for their contributions and abilities to lead. And maybe another fantasy tip sheet, but I have to win again before that happens. It’s been a rough couple of weeks. Until then, cheers.